The perception of one's own scientificness and wisdom is one
of the reasons why many turn their backs on God and the
Christian faith. A person likes to think that he has a
scientific view, that he is rational , and that his view is
unbiased, dispassionate, and based on facts. At least no one
wants to admit that he is a religious fanatic or, for
example, a fundamentalist, which some newspapers and
journalists like to use (many lump all religiosity and
also Islam into this group). Almost everyone
distinguishes between faith and science, and that man
himself is free from all prejudices and preferences. The
writing below by a free thinker well reflects this attitude
held by people who consider themselves to be scientific:
I wish briefly that people would think scientifically.
Generally,
it looks like most people try to manage by thinking as
little as possible. (…) The most important part of a
scientific way of thinking is freedom from prejudices,
predilections and devotions. The target of a scientist is
always the truth, regardless of how unpleasant it may be or
how much confusion it may cause to people whose beliefs it
shows wrong. (1)
So, what do people consider to be a scientific approach?
Most people believe it means following an atheistic
philosophy that includes believing that the universe came
into being by itself, that life came into being by itself,
and that all species evolved from one simple cell that came
from the ocean. A person who claims that he or she is
scientific usually means that these statements about our
origins are true. We will not address the accuracy of those
claims in this writing. Instead, we will look at this
“scientific approach” from another perspective.
Scientific approach or faith? If
we start from the idea that someone's worldview is
scientific and not based on faith at all, does such a person
exist? How many people act only on facts in the field of
science and in ordinary life, but do not use their faith? Is
it possible to find such a person?
If we are honest, practically no one works without
faith. In the field of science, it manifests itself in
trusting the credibility and information of others. Their
opinions are considered reliable because they are thought to
be in the know about things. It is exactly the same in the
area of ordinary life. Even in that, we trust in what others
say and consider their words to be true. We personally check
only a small part of the things that we assume to be true.
Therefore, everybody believes in something; nobody
stands on neutral ground. Every person believes in
something; also one who believes he bases everything on
facts. There is no such thing as a completely scientific
man, because it is impossible.
The following examples highlight the importance of faith
and its occurrence in everyday life:
• A girl trusts her mother's word that she will get a new
dress. It is faith.
• People believe that such a place as Antarctica exists,
even though very few have been there.
• When there are store advertisements in newspapers, we
believe them and go shopping based on them.
• History is an area where we know everything based on the
word of others. For example, the existence of Napoleon and
Caesar can no longer be proven scientifically, but we have
to rely on the word of others. It is a faith that everyone
has to lean on.
• Questions about the origin of the universe, life and man
belong to the area of faith. None of us witnessed the birth
of these things. There are only different theories about how
they started, but scientifically it is impossible to prove
their origin.
So, whenever we deal with the three basic pillars of the
scientific ideology – the origins of the universe, the
origins of life and the theory of evolution – we end up
having to accept the following conclusions:
• The idea of how the universe began is based on faith. The
two most common ideas are that it came into existence by
itself or that the universe is God's creation. The problem
is that we cannot prove either of these notions
scientifically because we cannot go back in time. If one is
scientific in this area, one should actually have been
looking at the early moments of the universe, but that is
impossible. That's why we believe in one or the other
theory, but no one has absolute proof. If we claim
otherwise, we are mistaken.
• The origin of life is a similar matter. No one was there
to witness it. Therefore, this concept is also based on
faith. So far, there is not the slightest evidence that life
could have originated by itself.
• The theory of evolution is based on the belief that in the
past there has been evolution from simple forms of life
towards more complex forms. No one has witnessed whether it
really happened. Many well-known paleontologists have
strictly denied the notion that there are intermediate forms
between basic groups in the fossil record.
Can we trust the brain of an ape?
When it is a question of the term “scientific view”, it
usually refers to the theory of evolution, in which life
evolved from simple life forms and humans evolved from
ape-like creatures. Or if we go far enough in the
evolutionist thought model, it leads to the fact that man
too was born as a result of the big bang from a small space
the size of a pinhead. This is how people might think in
this naturalistic thought model.
But there is a big problem with the same way of
thinking: how can you trust a person's judgment if he is
descended from an ape or even more primitive life form? If
his brain and thinking are the result of only random
processes, does it make sense to value such information?
Doesn't his sanity lose its bottom if it comes from some
ape-like creature or even the Big Bang? Reasonable
reasoning, notion of one's own scientificness and
intelligence is questionable if the person's background is
like that. It can be a case of great self-deception and risk
of delusions. We cannot rely on our scientificness if our
origins are irrational and impersonal. Anyone who claims
otherwise is not himself scientific.
I remember how a young man said in a seminar, “I cannot
believe in creation, I believe in the Big Bang. We are only
a result of chance and random events. There is no God. What
do you say to that?”
I replied, “Well, if we are the result of chance, then
also your brain is a result of chance. Therefore, your ways
of thinking which determine your logic are also the result
of chance. If your logic is the result of an occasional
series of events, you cannot be sure that it has developed
in the right way. You cannot even be sure that you are
asking the right questions because you cannot trust your own
logic.”
He was speechless. Later, he came to me and asked about
the best books concerning the subject, saying that he should
think seriously about this issue. He had begun to understand
that without an absolute (God) he would have nothing. (2)
The question of the existence of God. A
person who has a “scientific view of the world” may also
deny the existence of God. People with such an atheistic
approach are confident when saying that there is no God who
created everything and with whom people can interact. Faith
in God is only considered to be wishful thinking, something
to which reasonable and scientific people do not resort.
Naturally, it is difficult to prove that this atheistic
view is right. If somebody says, “There is no God”, that
does not prove that God does not exist. It is a question of
religious bias, not of certain knowledge, because no one has
unlimited knowledge of everything. That would require
complete and exhaustive information on all matters, but that
is impossible for us. How does a person know that God does
not stay in that sector, about which he himself has no
knowledge? It is very possible because every person is a
finite being. Therefore, we are left with only belief or
disbelief in the existence of God.
However, according to the Bible, something can be known
about God. It will be evident in at least three areas that
we are going to look at.
Nature,
its beauty and complexity testify to the Creator. Similarly,
human personality, reason, emotions and the difference from
animals are compatible with the Bible's description. These
are not absolute proofs of God, but the Bible's teaching
that God has created everything and made man in his own
image can be deduced from them. This evidence fits better
with a theistic worldview than with the impersonal and
irrational beginning of everything.
- (Ps 19:1) The heavens declare the glory of God; and the
firmament shows his handiwork.
- (Rom 1:19,20) Because that which may be known of God is
manifest in them; for God has showed it to them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation
of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the
things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so
that they are without excuse
What about the possibility that nature has not born from the
hand of almighty God? In this atheistic model, we encounter
big problems for which no solution has been found. The
Bible's model of an almighty Creator is a much more
reasonable concept.
• The Big Bang theory is one of the most incredible
theories. The idea that hundreds of millions of galaxies and
stars, Earth and other planets, seas, rocks, giraffes,
elephants, man, flowers, trees, butterflies, birds,
mosquitoes, fish and other creatures have come from a space
the size of a pinhead is a completely absurd idea. This
thing can be believed, but it doesn't seem like a very wise
theory.
• As stated, the origin of life has not been proven. The
more information has been accumulated, the bigger the
problem has been identified.
• The absence of intermediate forms suggests that the
species have been separate from the beginning. This fact
fits better with the biblical description than the atheistic
model.
History.
Historical research has repeatedly confirmed the accuracy of
the Bible's descriptions. At least 30 people from the New
Testament are mentioned in other sources, so the question is
about historical people and things. Of course, this in
itself does not prove the inner teaching of the Bible to be
true, but it gives a good reason to find out about things.
God’s revelation. What
about more direct evidence for God's existence? Those who
are atheists and agnostics often make the argument that if
God exists, why doesn't he reveal himself to us? "Show us
God and we will believe," they say.
However, God has already shown Himself to us. The entire
revelation of the New Testament is based on the fact that
God became a man through Jesus Christ, lived a sinless life
as a human, took our sins to the cross and opened us a path
to Heaven. God took the initiative and approached us in
human form as the New Testament shows. Jesus himself said
that he was not of this world like other people, and that he
had come from heaven to do the will of his Father. This
matter, God's revelation, is well expressed in the following
verses:
- (Hebr 1:1,2) God, who at sundry times and
in divers manners spoke in time past to the fathers by the
prophets,
2 Has in these last days spoken to us by his Son,
whom he has appointed heir of all things, by whom also he
made the worlds;
- (John 1:18) No man has seen God at any time, the
only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he
has declared him.
- (2 Cor 5:19,20) To wit, that God was in Christ,
reconciling the world to himself, not imputing their
trespasses to them; and has committed to us the word of
reconciliation.
20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did
beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be you
reconciled to God.
So God has already revealed himself and made known his plan
and will for every person.
However, one thing prevents people from understanding
this matter: disbelief. When the letter of Hebrews says that
without faith it is impossible to please God, this is true
of atheists and agnostics who do not want to believe the
revelation of the Bible.
God has indeed revealed himself and exists according to
the Bible, but disbelief and an attitude where people don't
even want to find the truth - many exclude in advance the
possibility that God could announce Himself - prevent them
from reaching clarity and certainty. When Jesus said that
”He that seeks finds; and to him that knocks it shall be
opened” (Matt 7:8), not many are ready to even seek.
Then it is impossible for them to find anything. The Bible
talks about wrong attitudes, unbelief, faith and finding God
in the following way. Do you have an unbelieving heart so
that you reject in advance the possibility that God exists
and that he wants man in His communion:
- (Hebr 3:12) Take heed, brothers, lest there be in
any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the
living God.
- (Rev 21:8) But the fearful, and unbelieving,
and the abominable, and murderers, and fornicators, and
sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their
part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone: which
is the second death.
- (Hebr 11:6) But without faith it is impossible to
please him: for he that comes to God must believe
that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that
diligently seek him.
- (1 John 5:10) He that believes on the Son of God has the
witness in himself: he that believes not God has made
him a liar; because he believes not the record that God gave
of his Son.
- (Hebr 4:2) For to us was the gospel preached, as well as
to them: but the word preached did not profit them,
not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
- (2 Cor 5:7) For we walk by faith, not by sight
- (Rom 4:3-5) For what said the scripture?
Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for
righteousness.
4 Now to him that works is the reward not reckoned of grace,
but of debt.
5 But to him that works not, but believes on him that
justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted for
righteousness.
- (Mark 4:39,40) And he arose, and rebuked the wind, and
said to the sea, Peace, be still. And the wind ceased, and
there was a great calm.
40 And he said to them, Why are you so fearful? how is
it that you have no faith?