The Bible, History and Biblical Criticism – Articles and Analyses
This page gathers my writings in which I discuss the historical reliability of the Bible, the Flood, the Ice Age, as well as liberal theology and biblical criticism. I examine the topic from the perspective of history, archaeology, natural science and theology, aiming for honest and source‑based analysis.
The goal is to help the reader understand:
-
the historical reliability of the Bible
-
the relationship between the Flood and the Ice Age
-
how the signs in nature fit the biblical description
-
the background assumptions of liberal theology and biblical criticism
-
why the Bible can be trusted also in the light of history
Bible and History – Related Articles
The Bible and history
Read the article: The Bible and history. This article examines the historical reliability of the Bible in light of archaeology, contemporary testimonies and the internal consistency of the texts. Dozens of biblical people, places and events have been confirmed as research has progressed. The Bible describes real human history that can be verified.
The early stages of mankind
Read the article: The early stages of mankind. This writing examines the early stages of humanity from the perspective of the Bible and compares them with other ancient sources. Particular attention is paid to the first eleven chapters of Genesis, which are often questioned. The stories of many nations and archaeological findings support the biblical description of a common origin and the historical nature of the Bible.
The origin of man and the Fall
Read the article: The origin of man and the Fall This article discusses the origin of humanity and the Fall as a historical event. It considers how these accounts explain human moral reality and the state of the world better than naturalistic explanations. If the reality of the Fall and sin is denied, as some “modern” pastors have done, one ends up in logical contradiction: such people must explain evil without sin. If violence, greed, deceit, theft, sexual abuse or the wrongdoings of Hitler and dictators are not sin, then what are they?
Josephus’ book War of the Jews and biblical history
Read the article: Josephus book War of the Jews and biblical history. The same people and events mentioned in the Bible also appear in other sources. Read what the historian Josephus wrote.
The Apocryphal books of the Old Testament and history of the Bible
Read the article: The apocryphal books of the Old Testament and history of the Bible. The same people and events mentioned in the Bible also appear in other sources, such as the Old Testament Apocrypha. Read more here!
The Flood, the Ice Age and the Signs of Nature
Is the Christian faith true?
Read the article: Is the Chrístian faith true? This writing discusses the historical foundation of the Christian faith and how the biblical accounts align with archaeology and natural science. Observations in nature, historical sources, archaeology and fulfilled prophecies in Jewish history all point to the reliability of the Christian faith and the Bible.
Three natureprograms under review
Read the article: Three nature programs under review. This article evaluates three nature documentaries and their explanations of Earth’s history. It shows how the claims presented in the programs often contradict the Bible and real observations. Interestingly, the researchers in the programs acknowledge clear signs of powerful water activity in the past — yet due to their worldview and education, they do not connect it to the Flood.
Secular science program under review
Read the article: Secular science program under review. The program’s claims about the origin and development of Earth are compared with the biblical account and natural evidence. The writing highlights the program’s underlying assumptions. The producers and researchers have nevertheless observed the destructive power of water in the past, which clearly points to the Flood.
The "Ice Age: A Frozen World" program under review
Read the article: The "Ice Age: A Frozen World" program under review. This article shows that many signs interpreted as evidence of an Ice Age fit better with the Flood than with Ice Age theory. Researchers and program makers acknowledge the destructive power of water, but due to the atheistic teaching they received in school, they do not connect these observations to the Flood.
The Flood has occurred
Read the article: The Flood has occurred. This article discusses the Flood as a historical and global event. Hundreds of nations have preserved stories of a great flood, supporting the biblical account. Clear evidence of the Flood includes marine fossils found in high mountain ranges — even on the summit of Mount Everest.
Has there been an ice age?
Read the article: Has there been an ice age? This writing considers whether the Ice Age occurred in the form presented by modern science and offers the Flood’s after‑effects as an alternative. The signs in nature point to the Flood, not to an Ice Age.
Denying the Flood
Read the article: Denying the Flood. This article discusses why the Flood is rejected in the modern scientific worldview and shows that the rejection is often based on assumptions. When people have a naturalistic worldview and interpret everything through evolutionary lenses and millions of years, they reject even clear evidence pointing to the Flood.
Liberal Theology and Biblical Criticism
Blind leaders of the blind
Read the article: Blind leaders of the blind. This writing discusses spiritual blindness and how liberal theology has led many astray when the authority of the Bible has been rejected. Liberal theologians often want to appear scientific, but in reality their supposed scientific approach often means a naturalistic worldview.
Can we trust in criticism of the Bible?
Read the article: Canwe trust in criticism of the Bible? This article critically evaluates modern biblical criticism and its assumptions. Many of its foundations are philosophical rather than historical. Researchers may have a naturalistic bias that affects their conclusions. For this reason they reject, for example, the miracles mentioned in the Bible. The issue is no longer science but a worldview that guides their conclusions.
“The Bible isn't historically reliable”
Read the article: "The Bible isn't historically reliable". This writing refutes the claim that the Bible is an unreliable historical document and presents counter‑evidence from archaeology and textual criticism.
“Scientific Bible research”
Read the article: "Scientific Bible research". This article examines what “scientific biblical studies” means and why its conclusions are not always scientific but ideological.
Rewriting history, i.e. turning to fables
Read the article: Rewriting history. This writing discusses how history has been reshaped to fit a naturalistic worldview and how biblical history has been pushed aside.
Whose Words?
Read the article: Whose words? This article reflects on whose word we ultimately trust — human or God’s. The text emphasizes the reliability of God’s revelation.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About Biblical History
🏺 Archaeology and the Bible
How does archaeology support the Bible? Dozens of people, places and events mentioned in the Bible have been confirmed as archaeological research has progressed, showing that the Bible describes real human history.
🌊 The Flood in World Traditions
Are there flood traditions in different cultures? Yes — hundreds of nations around the world have preserved stories of a great flood, supporting the biblical account of a global historical event.
🌍 Natural Evidence of the Flood
What natural evidence of the Flood can be observed? Clear evidence includes marine fossils in high mountain ranges, such as on the summit of Mount Everest, and signs of destructive water activity in the ground.
🧠 Naturalism and Biblical Interpretation
How does a naturalistic worldview affect biblical interpretation? Naturalism assumes everything happens slowly over millions of years, leading to the rejection of clear evidence for the Flood or biblical miracles based on prior assumptions.
📚 Liberal Theology and Miracles
Why does liberal theology reject biblical miracles? Liberal theology is often rooted in a naturalistic worldview that denies the supernatural. The issue is not history but a philosophical stance guiding researchers’ conclusions.
❄️ The Ice Age and the Flood
Can Ice Age evidence be explained by the Flood? Many signs interpreted as Ice Age evidence fit better with the Flood and its after‑effects. The massive movement of water often explains the observations better than traditional Ice Age theory.
🍎 The Historicity of the Fall
What happens if the historicity of the Fall is denied? Denying the Fall leads to a logical contradiction in which the world’s evil (such as dictators or violence) cannot be fully explained without the reality of sin.
📜 The Preservation of Biblical Texts
Have the biblical texts been preserved accurately? Yes — archaeological findings, textual criticism and external sources (such as the historian Josephus) confirm that the biblical texts are exceptionally reliable documents.
🕰️ Rewriting History
Why is history rewritten from a naturalistic perspective? History is often reshaped to fit evolutionary theory and a naturalistic worldview, leading to attempts to obscure or reinterpret biblical history as mere myth.
✝️ The Origin of the Bible
Is the Bible the Word of God or the word of men? Although the Bible was written through human authors, it is God’s revelation, whose reliability is confirmed by fulfilled prophecies, archaeology and its unchanging internal truth.
About the Author – Jari Iivanainen
I have written numerous theological and historical articles dealing with the Christian faith, salvation, evolution theory, religions, worldviews, everyday life and ethical questions. My goal is to offer readers clear, well‑reasoned and respectful perspectives on spiritual and other topics. Above all, I hope that my writings will lead people toward salvation and the forgiveness of sins.
You can find more articles on the Writings page.
