|
|
|
This is a machine translation made by Google Translate and has not been checked. There may be errors in the text. On the right, there are more links to translations made by Google Translate. In addition, you can read other articles in your own language when you go to my English website (Jari's writings), select an article there and transfer its web address to Google Translate (https://translate.google.com/?sl=en&tl=fi&op=websites).
Kiristanci da kimiyya
Shin bangaskiyar Kirista ta zama cikas ga kimiyya ko ta inganta shi? Karanta shaida!
Taken wannan labarin shine bangaskiyar Kirista da kimiyya. Ta yaya bangaskiyar Kirista ta shafi kimiyya da ci gabanta? Shin ya zama cikas ga ci gaban kimiyya ko ya inganta shi? Idan aka bincika wannan batu ta hanyar kafofin watsa labarai na duniya kawai da kuma rubuce-rubucen masana kimiyya waɗanda basu yarda da Allah ba, sau da yawa suna gabatar da ra'ayi mai farin jini game da rikici tsakanin bangaskiya da kimiyya. Ana tunanin cewa imani da Allah da kimiyya gaba dayan juna ne kuma bangaskiyar Kirista ta zama cikas ga ci gaban kimiyya. A cikin wannan ra'ayin, kimiyya ya kamata ya kasance mai karfi a Girka kuma kawai ya sake ci gaba lokacin da, lokacin haskakawa, ya rabu da addinin wahayi kuma ya fara dogara ga hankali da lura. Muhimmancin Darwin musamman ana la'akari da mahimmanci ga nasara ta ƙarshe na ra'ayin kimiyya. Amma menene gaskiyar lamarin? Tushen bangaskiyar Kiristanci bai taɓa zama kimiyya da yin kimiyya ba, amma bangaskiya cikin wanzuwar Allah da Yesu Kiristi, wanda ta wurinsa za a iya gafarta wa kowa na zunubansa. Duk da haka, wannan ba yana nufin cewa bangaskiyar Kirista ba ta tasiri kimiyya da ci gaban al'umma ba. Akasin haka, mahimmancin Yesu da bangaskiyar Kirista ya kasance mai mahimmanci ga haihuwa da ci gaban kimiyya. Wannan ra'ayi ya dogara ne akan abubuwa da yawa, waɗanda za mu ci gaba a cikin su a gaba. Mu fara da harshe da karatu.
Karatu: ƙamus, nahawu, haruffa. Na farko, haihuwar harsunan littattafai da karatu. Kowa ya fahimci cewa idan al’umma ba ta da harshenta na adabi kuma mutane ba za su iya karatu ba, to hakan ya zama cikas ga ci gaban ilimi, bincike, haifuwar abubuwan kirkire-kirkire da yada ilimi. Sannan babu littafai, ba za ka iya karanta su ba, kuma ilimi ba ya yaduwa. Al'umma na ci gaba da kasancewa a cikin wani hali. To, ta yaya bangaskiyar Kirista ta rinjayi ƙirƙirar harsunan adabi da karatu? Wannan shi ne inda yawancin masu bincike ke da makaho. Ba su san cewa kusan dukan harsunan adabi Kiristoci salihai ne suka halicce su ba. Alal misali, a nan ƙasar Finland, Mikael Agricola, ɗan ƙasar Finland mai gyara addini kuma uban littattafai, ya buga littafin ABC na farko da Sabon Alkawari da kuma sassan wasu littattafan Littafi Mai Tsarki. Mutanen sun koyi karatu ta wurinsu. A Jamus, Martti Luther ya yi irin wannan abu. Ya fassara Littafi Mai Tsarki zuwa Jamusanci da yarensa. An yi ɗaruruwan bugu na fassararsa kuma yaren da Luther yayi amfani da shi ya zama yaren adabi tsakanin Jamusawa. Ingila fa? William Tyndale, wanda ya fassara Littafi Mai Tsarki zuwa Turanci, ya taka muhimmiyar rawa a wannan. Fassarar Tyndale ta shafi haihuwar harshen Ingilishi na zamani. Bisa ga fassarar Tyndale, an ƙirƙiri fassarar King James daga baya, wanda shine mafi shaharar fassarar Turanci na Littafi Mai Tsarki. Misali ɗaya shine haruffan mutanen Slavic, waɗanda ake kira haruffan Cyrillic. An ba su sunan St. Cyril, wanda shi ne mai wa’azi a ƙasashen waje a cikin Slavs kuma ya lura cewa ba su da haruffa. Cyril ya tsara musu haruffa don su karanta Linjila game da Yesu. Kafin a haifi ikon karatu, dole ne yaren da aka rubuta ya wanzu. Ta wannan ma'ana, Kiristoci na mishan sun taka muhimmiyar rawa, ba kawai ƙarni da suka gabata a ƙasashen yamma ba, har ma a Afirka da Asiya daga baya. Wataƙila masu wa’azin bishara sun yi aiki na shekaru a cikin binciken harshe. Sun kirkiro nahawu na farko, kamus da haruffa. Ɗaya daga cikin irin waɗannan mutane shi ne ɗan mishan na Methodist Frank Laubach, wanda ya fara yaƙin neman ilimi na duniya. Ya rinjayi ci gaban ABC-littattafai a cikin harsuna 313. An nada shi manzon jahilai. Misalai na gaba suna magana iri ɗaya, haɓakar harsuna. Yana da mahimmanci cewa ko da irin waɗannan harsuna kamar Hindi, babban harshen Indiya, Urdu na Pakistan, da Bengali na Bangladesh suna da tushen nahawu da na harshe bisa tushen ayyukan Kirista. Daruruwan miliyoyin mutane suna magana kuma suna amfani da waɗannan harsuna.
Vishal Mangalwadi: Na girma a tsakiyar harshen Hindu a cikin Allahabad, kusan kilomita 80 daga Kashi, inda Tulsidas ya rubuta Ramcharitmanasin , mafi girman almara na addini na Arewacin Indiya. A koyaushe ana gaya mini cewa Hindi ta samo asali ne daga wannan babban almara. Amma da na karanta, sai na shiga rudani, domin na kasa fahimtar magana daya daga cikinta. Harshen “Hindi” na marubucin ya bambanta da nawa kuma na fara tambayar, daga ina yarena na asali – harshen ƙasar Indiya – ya samo asali. … Malaman Hindu kuma ba su haɓaka yaren ƙasar Indiya ba, Hindi. Godiya ce ga mafassaran Littafi Mai Tsarki irin su John Borthwick Gilchrist da masana harshe na mishan kamar Rev. SHKellogg cewa yaren adabin Hindi na yanzu ya fito daga yaren da mawaƙin Tulsidas (a kusa da 1532-1623). ... Mafassara Littafi Mai Tsarki da masu wa’azi a ƙasashen waje sun ba da fiye da yarena na asali na Hindi. Duk harsunan adabi na Indiya masu rai sun shaida aikinsu. A cikin 2005, Dr. Babu Verghese, wani mai bincike daga Mumbai amma mai magana da harshen Malayalam, ya gabatar da takardar shaidar digiri mai shafuka 700 zuwa Jami'ar Nagpur don dubawa. Ya nuna cewa masu fassara Littafi Mai Tsarki sun halicci harsuna 73 na adabi na zamani daga yarukan da yawancin Indiyawan da ba su iya karatu ba. Waɗannan sun haɗa da yarukan ƙasa na hukuma na Indiya (Hindi), Pakistan (Urdu) da Bangladesh (Bengali). Malaman Bramine guda biyar sun yi karatun digirin digirgir na Verghes tare da ba shi lakabin Doctor of Falsafa a shekarar 2008. A lokaci guda kuma, gaba daya sun ba da shawarar cewa, bayan wallafawa, a dauki littafin a matsayin wani littafi na wajibi don nazarin harshen Indiya. (1)
Ayyukan mishan na Kirista ko da yaushe ya kasance nau'i mai faɗi na taimakon mutane, har ya kai ga taimakon marasa lafiya, naƙasassu, mayunwata, marasa gida da wariya. A cikin ƙasashe da yawa na Afirka, ayyukan Kirista sun gina tushen tsarin makarantu gaba ɗaya ta fuskar ilimin asali da na sana'a. Hakazalika, aikin ya ba da gudummawa sosai wajen samar da cibiyar kula da lafiya... Shahararren mai bincike a Afirka, farfesa a jami'ar Yale Lamin Sanneh ya yi iƙirarin cewa a Afirka, masu mishan sun yi hidima mafi girma ga al'adun gida ta hanyar. ƙirƙirar tushen rubutun harshe. (2)
Ayyukan karatu da adabi. Kamar yadda aka ce, yawancin harsuna sun sami nahawu da tushen adabi daga tasirin bangaskiyar Kirista. Atheists da jahohi ba su ne farkon wannan ci gaban, amma wakilan bangaskiyar Kirista. Ci gaban al’ummomi da an yi jinkiri shekaru aru-aru ba tare da bangaskiya ga Allah da Yesu ba. Wannan yanki ya haɗa da ayyukan karatu a Turai da sauran sassan duniya. Ta wurinsu, mutane suna koyan karanta Littafi Mai Tsarki da wasu littattafai kuma su koyi sababbin abubuwa. Idan ba ka yi karatu ba, zai yi wuya ka koyi sababbin abubuwa da wasu suka rubuta game da su. Sa’ad da bangaskiyar Kirista ta ci nasara a filin ta aikin wa’azi a ƙasashen waje, ta kuma kyautata yanayin zamantakewa da matsayin al’ummai da yawa. Irin waɗannan abubuwa su ne ingantacciyar yanayin lafiya, ingantaccen tattalin arziki, ingantaccen yanayin zamantakewa, ƙarancin cin hanci da rashawa da mace-macen yara kuma, ba shakka, ingantaccen ilimin karatu. Idan babu aikin mishan da bangaskiyar Kirista, da za a sami wahala da talauci da yawa a duniya kuma mutane ba za su san karatu ba. Daga cikin wasu, Robert Woodberry, mataimakin farfesa a Jami'ar Texas, ya lura da alaƙa tsakanin aikin mishan da dimokuradiyya, ingantacciyar matsayi da karatun mutane:
Masanin kimiyya: Aikin mishan ya sa dimokuradiyya
A cewar Robert Woodberry, mataimakin farfesa a Jami'ar Texas, tasirin aikin mishan na Furotesta a cikin 1800s da farkon 1900s kan ci gaban dimokuradiyya ya kasance mafi mahimmanci fiye da tunanin farko. Maimakon samun ƙaramin rawa a cikin ci gaban dimokuradiyya, mishan na da rawar gani a cikinta a yawancin ƙasashen Afirka da Asiya. Mujallar Christianity Today ta yi bayani game da lamarin. Robert Woodberry ya yi nazarin alakar da ke tsakanin aikin mishan da abubuwan da suka shafi dimokiradiyya kusan shekaru 15. A cewarsa, a can inda ’yan mishan na Furotesta suka sami babban tasiri. A can tattalin arziki a yau ya fi haɓaka kuma yanayin kiwon lafiya ya fi na yankunan, inda tasirin masu wa’azi a ƙasashen waje ya yi kaɗan ko babu. A yankunan da ke da tarihin mishan, yawan mace-macen yara a halin yanzu ya ragu, ana samun raguwar cin hanci da rashawa, ilimin karatu ya zama ruwan dare kuma samun ilimi yana da sauƙi, musamman ga mata. A cewar Robert Woodberry, Kiristoci na farfaɗowar Furotesta ne suka yi tasiri mai kyau. Sabanin haka, limaman gwamnati ko ’yan mishan na Katolika kafin shekarun 1960 ba su da irin wannan tasiri. (3)
Ɗaya daga cikin misali mai kyau na yadda bangaskiyar Kirista ta rinjayi karatu da wallafe-wallafe shine cewa ba sai a kusa da 1900 ba cewa wallafe-wallafen duniya sun mamaye wallafe-wallafen ruhaniya a tallace-tallace. Littafi Mai-Tsarki da koyarwarsa sun kasance a matsayi mai mahimmanci na ƙarni, har a ƙarni na ƙarshe ya rasa muhimmancinsa a ƙasashen Yamma. Daidai ne cewa a ƙarni na 20, lokacin da aka yi watsi da bangaskiyar Kirista, an yi yaƙe-yaƙe mafi girma a tarihi? Wani misali kuma shi ne Ingila, wadda ita ce kasa mafi ci gaba a duniya a karni na 18 da 19. Amma mene ne bayan kyakkyawar ci gaban Ingila? Tabbas abu ɗaya shine farkawa ta ruhaniya inda mutane suka koma ga Allah. Abubuwan alheri da yawa sun zo a sakamakon haka, kamar karatun karatu, kawar da bauta, da kyautata matsayin talakawa da ma'aikata. John Wesley, wanda aka san shi a matsayin mai wa'azi mafi mahimmanci na ƙungiyar Methodist kuma ta wurinsa babban farkawa ya zo Ingila a karni na 18, ya yi tasiri sosai ga wannan ci gaba. An ce ta hanyar aikinsa Ingila ta tsira daga juyin juya hali irin wannan da ya faru a Faransa. Duk da haka, Wesley da abokan aikinsa kuma sun ba da gudummawa ga gaskiyar cewa wallafe-wallafen sun zama masu isa ga Turanci. The Encyclopedia Britannica ya bayyana Wesley game da haka cewa "babu wani a cikin karni na 18 da ya yi wani abu mai yawa don inganta karatun littattafai masu kyau, kuma ya kawo littattafai masu yawa a hannun mutane a kan farashi mai rahusa" ... A Ingila, sakamakon farfaɗowa, an kuma haifi aikin makarantar Lahadi a ƙarni na 18. Kusan 1830, kusan kashi ɗaya bisa huɗu na yara miliyan 1.25 na Ingila sun halarci makarantar Lahadi, inda suka koyi karatu da rubutu. Ingila ta zama al'umma masu ilimi da Kalmar Allah ta koyar; jihar ba ta yi tasiri ba. Amurka fa? Magana mai zuwa tana nufin wannan. John Dewey (1859-1952) ne ya furta hakan, wanda shi da kansa ya yi tasiri mai karfi wajen mayar da ilimi a Amurka. Duk da haka, ya bayyana yadda bangaskiyar Kirista ta yi tasiri mai kyau ga misali ga ilimi da kuma kawar da bauta a ƙasarsa:
Wadannan mutane (Kiristoci masu bishara) sune kashin bayan jin dadin jama'a, ayyukan siyasa da nufin kawo sauyi na zamantakewa, zaman lafiya da ilimin jama'a. Suna nuna tausayi da nuna jin kai ga wadanda ke cikin mawuyacin hali na tattalin arziki da sauran al'ummomi, musamman ma idan suka nuna ko da 'yar sha'awar tsarin gwamnatin jamhuriya - - Wannan bangare na al'ummar ya amsa da kyau ga bukatun da ake bukata na adalci da kuma raba daidai da daidai. dama bisa ga tunaninsu na daidaito. Ya bi sawun Lincoln wajen kawar da bautar kuma ya yarda da ra'ayoyin Roosevelt lokacin da ya la'anci kamfanoni "mugayen" da kuma tarin dukiya a hannun 'yan kaɗan. (4)
Jami'o'i. Tun da farko, an bayyana yadda bangaskiyar Kirista ta yi tasiri wajen samar da rubutattun harsuna da ilimin karatu a ƙarni da suka gabata da kuma a halin yanzu. Misali, a kasashen Afirka, tushen tsarin makarantu ta fuskar ilimin asali da na sana'a ya samo asali ne daga tasirin ayyukan kiristoci, haka ma harkokin kiwon lafiya. Idan ba tare da tasirin bangaskiyar Kirista ba, ci gaban al'ummomi zai iya jinkiri shekaru aru-aru. Wani yanki shine jami'o'i da makarantu. Tare da karatun karatu, suna da mahimmanci ga ci gaban kimiyya, bincike, haihuwar abubuwan ƙirƙira da yaduwar bayanai. Ta hanyar su, ilimi da bincike suna ci gaba zuwa wani sabon matsayi. Ta yaya bangaskiyar Kirista ta shafi wannan yanki? Ƙungiyoyin masu bin addini da zindikanci sau da yawa ba su san cewa Littafi Mai Tsarki da bangaskiyar Kirista sun taka muhimmiyar rawa a wannan yanki ba. Daruruwan jami’o’i da dubun-dubatar makarantu Kiristoci salihai ne suka soma ko ta aikin wa’azi a ƙasashen waje. Ba a haife su a kan zindiqai ba, domin babu jami’o’in boko da na gwamnati. Misali, wadannan jami'o'i sun shahara a Ingila da Amurka: - Oxford da Cambridge. Dukansu garuruwan suna da majami'u da yawa da wuraren ibada. An kafa waɗannan jami’o’in tun asali don koyar da Littafi Mai Tsarki. - Harvard. Sunan wannan jami'a bayan Reverend John Harvard. Taken sa daga 1692 shine Veritas Christo et Ecclesiae (gaskiya ga Kristi da Ikilisiya) - An kafa Jami'ar Yale daga tsohon dalibin Harvard, limamin Puritan Cotton Mather. - Shugaban farko na Jami'ar Princeton (asali Kwalejin New Jersey) shine Jonathan Edwards, wanda aka san shi da babban farkawa a Amurka a karni na 18. Shi ne shahararren mai wa'azin wannan farkawa, tare da George Whitefield. - Jami'ar Pennsylvania. George Whitefield, wani shugaban babbar farkawa, ya kafa makarantar da daga baya ta ci gaba zuwa Jami'ar Pennsylvania. Whitefield ɗan mai gadin mashaya ne kuma abokin aikin John Wesley wanda aka ambata a baya lokacin da yake Ingila. Yana da kyakkyawar murya mai ban sha'awa da ban sha'awa da ba a saba gani ba, ta yadda zai iya magana da ji ga dubun dubatar mutane a taron waje. Ya kuma iya yin wa’azi da hawaye domin tausayin da Allah ya yi masa domin mutane Indiya fa? Ba a san Indiya da Kiristanci ba. Duk da haka, a wannan ƙasa, kamar a Afirka, akwai dubban makarantu da aka haifa bisa tushen bangaskiyar Kirista. Jami'o'i na farko a Indiya su ma an haife su a kan tushe guda. Irin wadannan jami'o'i kamar jami'ar Calcutta, Madras, Bombay da Serampore sun shahara. Bugu da kari, Jami'ar Allahabad, wacce aka kafa a 1887, sananne ne. Biyar daga cikin Firayim Minista bakwai na Indiya sun fito ne daga wannan birni, kuma yawancin hukumomin Indiya sun yi karatu a Jami'ar Allahabad.
Juyin juya hali a kimiyya. Labarin ya fara ne daga ra'ayin da wadanda basu yarda da Allah ba cewa bangaskiyar Kirista ta zama cikas ga ci gaban kimiyya. Duk da haka, wannan ra'ayi yana da sauƙin tambaya, domin harsunan adabi, ilimin karatu da jami'o'i sun samo asali ne daga tasirin bangaskiyar Kirista. Abin da ake kira juyin juya halin kimiyya fa? Sau da yawa ana gudanar da shi a cikin da'ira na masu bin addini da zindiqai cewa wannan tashin hankali ba shi da alaƙa da bangaskiyar Kirista, amma ana iya yin tambaya game da wannan ra'ayi. Domin a ma’anar zamani sau daya ne kawai aka fara kimiyya, wato a kasashen Turai na karni na 16-18, inda akidar Kirista ta yi karfi. Ba a fara shi a cikin al'umma masu son addini ba, musamman a cikin al'ummar da aka yi wahayi zuwa ga bangaskiyar Kirista. Kusan duk manyan masana kimiyya sun yi imani da halitta. Daga cikinsu akwai Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Blaise Pascal, Michael Faraday, James Clerck Maxwell, John Ray, Louis Pasteur, da dai sauransu. Su ba wakilan wayewa ba ne amma na rukunan Kiristanci.
Yawancin masana tarihi da masana ilimin zamantakewa sun lura cewa Kiristoci, bangaskiyar Kirista, da cibiyoyin Kirista sun ba da gudummawa ta hanyoyi daban-daban don haɓaka koyaswa, hanyoyi, da tsarin da suka haifar da kimiyyar halitta ta zamani (...) Ko da yake akwai ra'ayoyi daban-daban. na tasirinsa kusan dukkanin masana tarihi a yau sun yarda cewa Kiristanci (Katolika da Furotesta iri ɗaya) sun ƙarfafa masu tunani da yawa na zamanin da su shiga cikin tsarin nazarin yanayi. Masana tarihi sun kuma lura cewa ra'ayoyin da aka aro daga Kiristanci sun sami hanyarsu ta tattaunawa ta kimiyya da sakamako mai kyau. Wasu masana kimiyya ma suna da'awar cewa ra'ayin yanayi yana aiki bisa ga wasu dokoki ya samo asali daga tiyolojin Kirista. (5)
Menene ya haifar da juyin juya halin kimiyya? Dalili ɗaya shine, kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, jami'o'i. A shekara ta 1500, akwai kusan sittin daga cikinsu a Turai. Wadannan jami'o'in ba jami'o'i ba ne da masu zaman kansu da kuma gwamnati ke kula da su, amma sun taso ne tare da goyon bayan majami'a na zamanin da, kuma binciken kimiyyar halitta da ilmin taurari sun taka rawa a cikinsu. A cikinsu akwai 'yancin yin bincike da tattaunawa da yawa, wanda aka fi so. Wadannan jami'o'in suna da dubban daruruwan dalibai, kuma sun taimaka wajen shirya fagen juyin juya halin kimiyya ya yiwu a Turai a cikin karni na 16-18th. Wannan juyin juya hali bai taso ba kwatsam daga inda babu, sai dai ya samu ci gaba mai kyau. Sauran nahiyoyin ba su da ilimi mai yawa da jami'o'i iri ɗaya kamar na Turai.
Tsakanin Zamani ya haifar da ginshiƙi na babban ci gaban al'ummar Yamma: kimiyyar zamani. Da'awar da ta ce kimiyya ba ta wanzu kafin "Renaissance" ba gaskiya ba ne. Bayan sun san kansu da bincike na Girkanci na gargajiya, malaman Tsakiyar Zamani sun haɓaka tsarin akida, wanda ya jagoranci kimiyya sosai idan aka kwatanta da zamanin da. Jami'o'in, inda aka kare 'yancin ilimi daga ikon shugabanni, an kafa su a cikin 1100s. Waɗannan cibiyoyi koyaushe suna ba da mafaka don binciken kimiyya. Hatta tiyolojin kirista ya tabbatar da ya dace na musamman don ƙarfafa binciken yanayi, wanda aka gaskata shi ne halittar Allah. (6)
Magunguna da asibitoci. Wani yanki da addinin Kirista ya yi tasiri shine magani da haihuwar asibitoci. Wani muhimmin sashi shi ne sufaye, waɗanda suka adana, kwafi da fassara tsoffin rubuce-rubucen likitanci da sauran tsoffin ayyukan gargajiya da na kimiyya. Bugu da kari, sun kara inganta magunguna. Idan ba tare da ayyukansu ba, da magani ba zai ci gaba ba, kuma da ba a adana tsofaffin litattafai na zamanin da don karantawa na zamani ba. Kiwon lafiya, ayyukan jin kai da ƙungiyoyin agaji masu yawa (Red Cross, Save the Children...) su ma an fara su ta hanyar masu ikirarin kiristoci, domin bangaskiyar Kirista ta haɗa da tausayi ga maƙwabcin mutum koyaushe. Wannan ya dogara ne akan koyarwa da misalin Yesu. Maimakon haka, wadanda basu yarda da Allah ba da ’yan Adam sun kasance masu kallo a wannan yanki. Dan jarida dan kasar Ingila Malcolm Muggeridge (1903-1990), shi kansa dan Adam na duniya, amma duk da haka gaskiya, ya lura da haka. Ya kula da yadda ra'ayin duniya ke shafar al'ada:“Na shafe shekaru a Indiya da Afirka, kuma a duka biyun na ci karo da ayyuka masu yawa na adalci da Kiristoci na ɗarikoki dabam-dabam suke yi; amma ba sau ɗaya ba na ci karo da asibiti ko gidan marayu da ƙungiyar gurguzu ko kuma gidan kuturu ke kula da shi. aiki bisa tushen bil'adama." (7) Kalmomi na gaba sun ƙara nuna yadda bangaskiyar Kirista ta rinjayi reno da kuma wasu fannoni ta aikin wa’azi a ƙasashen waje. Yawancin asibitoci a Afirka da Indiya an haife su ta hanyar ayyukan Kirista da kuma sha'awar taimakawa. Babban ɓangaren asibitocin farko na Turai kuma ya samo asali ne a ƙarƙashin rinjayar bangaskiyar Kirista. Allah yana iya warkar da mutum kai tsaye, amma da yawa sun sami taimako ta hanyar magunguna da asibitoci. Bangaskiya ta Kirista ta taka muhimmiyar rawa a cikin haka.
A lokacin Tsakiyar Tsakiyar mutanen, waɗanda ke cikin Order of Saint Benedict, sun kula da asibitoci sama da dubu biyu a Yammacin Turai kaɗai. Karni na 12 na da matukar ma'ana ta wannan bangaren, musamman a can, inda odar Saint John ta yi aiki. Alal misali, an kafa babban Asibitin Ruhu Mai Tsarki a shekara ta 1145 a Montpellier, wanda nan da nan ya zama cibiyar ilimin likitanci da cibiyar kula da lafiya ta Montpellier a shekara ta 1221. Ban da kula da lafiya, waɗannan asibitocin suna ba da abinci ga mayunwata da abinci. yana kula da gwauraye da marayu, yana ba da sadaka ga masu bukata. (8)
Ko da yake Ikilisiyar Kirista ta sha suka sosai a tsawon tarihinta, har yanzu ita ce kan gaba wajen kula da marasa lafiya, da taimakon fursunonin da ba su da matsuguni ko waɗanda ke mutuwa da kuma inganta wuraren aiki. A Indiya mafi kyawun asibitoci da cibiyoyin ilimi da ke da alaƙa da su sakamakon aikin mishan na Kirista ne, har ma da yawan mabiya addinin Hindu suna amfani da waɗannan asibitoci fiye da asibitocin da gwamnati ke kula da su, domin sun san cewa za su sami kulawa mai kyau. can. An kiyasta cewa lokacin da aka fara yakin duniya na biyu, kashi 90% na ma’aikatan jinya a Indiya Kiristoci ne, kuma kashi 80% nasu sun sami iliminsu a asibitocin mishan. (9)
A cikin coci al'amuran wannan rayuwa an kula da su sosai kamar yadda ake kula da harkokin rayuwa ta gaba; kamar dai duk abin da ’yan Afirka suka cim ma, ya samo asali ne daga aikin mishan na coci. (Nelson Mandela a cikin tarihin rayuwarsa Long Walk to Freedom)
Shin Ikklisiya ta tsananta wa masana kimiyya? Kamar yadda aka fada, bangaskiyar Kirista ta yi tasiri sosai wajen haihuwar juyin juya halin kimiyya. Wani dalili na wannan shi ne jami'o'in da cocin ya kafa. Iƙirarin da waɗanda basu yarda da Allah suke so ba, wato bangaskiyar Kirista za ta zama cikas ga ci gaban kimiyya, don haka babban tatsuniya ce. Wannan kuma yana nuni ne da yadda kasashen da addinin kirista suka fi dadewa tasiri a fagen kimiyya da bincike. Game da ra’ayin cewa coci na tsananta wa masana kimiyya fa? Ƙungiyoyin waɗanda basu yarda da Allah ba suna son kiyaye wannan ra'ayi, amma yawancin masu bincike na tarihi suna la'akari da shi a matsayin gurbataccen tarihi. Wannan ra'ayi na adawa tsakanin bangaskiya da kimiyya ya samo asali ne a ƙarshen karni na 19, lokacin da marubutan da suka goyi bayan ka'idar Darwin, misali Andrew Dickson White da John William Draper, suka kawo ta a cikin littattafansu. Duk da haka, misali mai bincike James Hannam ya ce:
Sabanin abin da aka saba yi, coci ba ta taba goyon bayan ra'ayin kasa mai lebur ba, ba ta taba amincewa da binciken gawarwaki ba, kuma tabbas ba ta kona kowa a kan gungumen azaba saboda akidun kimiyyar su. (10)
Tim O'Neill dan kasar Australiya ya dauki matsayi kan wannan da'awar kuma ya nuna yadda mutane kadan suka sani game da tarihi: "Ba shi da wuya a harba wannan bijimin gunduwa-gunduwa, musamman ma lokacin da mutanen da ke magana game da shi ba su san komai ba game da tarihi. Sun tattara waɗannan ra'ayoyi masu ban mamaki daga shafukan yanar gizo da kuma shahararrun littattafai. Waɗannan iƙirarin sun ɓace lokacin da aka buga su da su. hujjar da ba za ta iya jurewa ba, Ina jin daɗin yi wa masu yada farfaganda dariya daidai ta hanyar tambayarsu su faɗi sunan ɗaya - ɗaya - masanin kimiyya wanda aka kona a kan gungumen azaba ko aka tsananta masa ko aka zalunta saboda bincikensa a tsakiyar zamanai. ... A lokacin da na lissafa masana kimiyya na Tsakiyar Zamani - Albertus Magnus, Robert Grosseteste, Roger Bacon, John Peckham, Duns Scotus, Thomas Bradwardine, Walter Burley, William Heytesbury, Richard Swineshead, John Dumbleton, Richard na Wallingford, Nicholas Oresme, Jean Buridan,da Nicolaus Cusanus—kuma na tambayi dalilin da ya sa waɗannan mutane cikin salama suka ci gaba da kimiyyar Zamani na Tsakiya ba tare da Ikilisiya ta dame su ba, abokan hamayyana sukan ɗaga kawunansu da mamaki, suna mamakin abin da ya faru da gaske.” (11) Galileo Galilei, wanda ya kifar da tsarin rana da ke kewaya duniya na Ptolemy na Helenanci fa? Gaskiya ne Paparoma ya yi masa kuskure, amma batun murdiya ne na amfani da iko, ba adawa da kimiyya ba. (I, Fafaroma da Cocin Katolika sun yi wasu abubuwa da yawa, irin su Crusades da Inquisition. Amma, batun watsi da addinin Kirista gaba ɗaya ne ko kuma rashin bin koyarwar Yesu. Mutane da yawa ba su fahimci hakan ba. bambanci.) Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa duka wakilan kimiyya da bangaskiya sun rabu cikin halayensu ga ka'idar Galileo. Wasu masana kimiyya sun kasance a gefensa, wasu suna adawa. Hakazalika, wasu limaman coci sun yi adawa da ra’ayinsa, wasu kuma sun kare. Wannan shine lamarin koyaushe lokacin da sabbin dabaru suka bayyana. Me ya sa Galileo ya ƙi yarda da Paparoma kuma ya sa a tsare shi a gida a cikin gidansa? Dalili ɗaya shine halin Galileo. Paparoma ya kasance babban mai sha'awar Galileo, amma rubutun Galileo na rashin dabara ya taimaka wajen ta'azzara lamarin. Ari Turunen ya rubuta game da asalin lamarin:
Duk da cewa Galileo Galilei ana daukarsa daya daga cikin manyan shahidan kimiyya, amma dole ne a tuna cewa bai ji dadi sosai a matsayinsa na mutum ba. Ya kasance mai girman kai da saurin fushi, ya yi ta kururuwa kuma ba shi da hazaka da hazaka don mu'amala da mutane. Godiya ga kaifi harshensa da barkwanci, shi ma ba shi da karancin abokan gaba. Ayyukan falaki Galileo yana amfani da tsarin tattaunawa. Littafin ya gabatar da wani hali mara hankali mai suna Simplicius, wanda ya gabatar da Galileo tare da mafi yawan maganganun rashin hankali. Maƙiyan Galileo sun yi nasarar shawo kan Paparoma cewa Galileo yana nufin Paparoma da siffar Simplicus. Bayan wannan ne kawai Urban VIII na banza da hankali ya ɗauki mataki akan Galileo ... . Ko Galilei yana nufin Paparoma tare da siffar Simplicus ko a'a, zaɓin sunan ba shi da kyau. Galilei bai damu da tushen samun nasarar rubutawa ba, wanda ya haɗa da mutunta mai karatu. (12)
Kuma wadanda basu yarda da Allah sun tsananta wa masana kimiyya ba? Aƙalla wannan ya faru ne a cikin Tarayyar Soviet da ba ta yarda da Allah ba, inda aka daure masana kimiyya da yawa, irin su masana ilimin halitta, wasu kuma aka kashe su saboda ra’ayinsu na kimiyya. Hakazalika, an kashe masana kimiyya da dama a juyin juya halin Faransa: masanin kimiyya Antoine Lavoisier, masanin astronomer Jean Sylvain Bally, masanin ma'adinai Philippe-Frédéric de Dietrich, astronomer Jean Baptiste Gaspard Bochart de Saron, masanin ilimin botanist Chrétien Guillaume de Lamoigon de Malesherbes. Duk da haka, ba a kashe su don ra'ayoyin kimiyya ba, amma don ra'ayinsu na siyasa. A nan ma, wani lamari ne na cin zarafi da mulki, wanda ya bambanta da yadda aka bi da Galileo.
Batar da hanyar kimiyya: Darwin ya jagoranci kimiyya a bata. Wannan labarin ya fara ne daga da'awar da waɗanda basu yarda da Allah ba cewa bangaskiyar Kirista ta zama cikas ga ci gaban kimiyya. An bayyana cewa babu wani tushe a cikin wannan da'awar, amma muhimmancin bangaskiyar Kirista ya kasance mai mahimmanci ga haihuwa da ci gaban kimiyya. Wannan ra'ayi ya ginu ne a kan abubuwa da dama kamar haihuwar harsunan adabi, ilmin rubutu, makarantu da jami'o'i, bunkasuwar likitanci da asibitoci, da yadda juyin juya halin kimiyya ya faru a karni na 16-18 na Turai, inda akidar Kiristanci ta yi karfi. Wannan canji bai fara a cikin al'umma masu son addini ba, musamman a cikin al'ummar da aka yi wahayi zuwa ga bangaskiyar Kirista. Idan bangaskiyar Kirista ta kasance tabbataccen al'amari ga ci gaban kimiyya, daga ina aka samo ra'ayin adawa da kimiyya da bangaskiyar Kirista? Ɗayan dalili na wannan hakika Charles Darwin tare da ka'idodin juyin halitta a karni na 19. Wannan ka'idar, wanda ya dace da dabi'a, shine babban laifin wannan hoton. Shahararren wanda bai yarda da Allah ba Richard Dawkins ya kuma bayyana cewa kafin zamanin Darwin zai yi masa wahala ya zama wanda bai yarda da Allah ba: "Ko da yake akwai yiwuwar atheism yana da inganci a gaban Darwin, amma Darwin ne kawai ya kafa harsashin rashin yarda da Allah a hankali". (13). Amma amma. Lokacin da masana kimiyyar dabi'a suka mutunta aikin Darwin da kokarinsu, sun yi daidai, wani bangare kuma kuskure. Suna da gaskiya cewa Darwin ƙwararren masanin halitta ne wanda ya yi cikakken nazarin yanayi, ya koyi batunsa kuma ya san yadda ake rubutu game da bincikensa. Babu wanda ya karanta littafinsa na magnum Akan Asalin Nau'ukan da zai iya musun hakan. Duk da haka, sun yi kuskure wajen yarda da tunanin Darwin na cewa an gaji kowane nau'in halitta daga kwayar halitta ta farko (ka'idar farko ta cell-da-man). Dalili kuwa mai sauƙi ne: Darwin bai iya nuna kowane misalan canje-canjen jinsuna ba a cikin littafinsa mai suna On the Origin of Species, sai dai kawai misalai na bambance-bambance da daidaitawa. Abubuwa biyu ne daban-daban. Bambance-bambance, kamar girman bakin tsuntsu, girman fuka-fuki, ko mafi kyawun juriya na wasu ƙwayoyin cuta, ba ta wata hanya ta tabbatar da cewa duk nau'in halitta na yanzu sun samo asali ne daga tantanin halitta na asali. Sharhi masu zuwa suna ba da ƙarin bayani game da batun. Darwin da kansa ya yarda cewa ba shi da misalan ainihin canje-canje a cikin nau'in halittu. A wannan ma'ana, ana iya cewa Darwin ya batar da kimiyya:
Darwin: A gaskiya na gaji da gaya wa mutane cewa ba na da'awar cewa ina da wata hujja kai tsaye na wani nau'in jinsin ya canza zuwa wani nau'in jinsin kuma na yi imani da wannan ra'ayi daidai ne musamman saboda ana iya haɗa abubuwa da yawa da kuma bayyana su bisa ga shi. (14)
Encyclopedia Britannica: Dole ne a jaddada cewa Darwin bai taba da'awar ya iya tabbatar da juyin halitta ko asalin jinsin ba. Ya yi iƙirarin cewa idan juyin halitta ya faru, za a iya bayyana abubuwa da yawa da ba za a iya bayyana su ba. Shaidar da ke goyan bayan juyin halitta ba kai tsaye ba ne.
"Abin mamaki ne cewa littafin da ya shahara wajen bayyana asalin jinsin halittu bai bayyana shi ta kowace hanya ba." (Christopher Booker, marubucin jaridar Times yana nufin Darwin's magnum opus, A Asalin Species ) (15)
Da Darwin ya koyar ta yadda a maimakon bishiyar iyali daya (ra'ayin juyin halitta, wanda ya dauka cewa rayuwa ta yanzu ta samo asali ne daga kwayar halitta ta farko), da an sami daruruwan bishiyoyin iyali, kuma kowane bishiya yana da rassa. da bifurcations, da ya kasance mafi kusanci ga gaskiya. Bambance-bambance yana faruwa, kamar yadda Darwin ya tabbatar, amma a cikin nau'ikan asali kawai. Abubuwan da aka lura sun fi dacewa da ƙirar halitta fiye da samfurin inda rayuwa ta yanzu ta samo asali daga tantanin halitta na farko, watau nau'i guda ɗaya:
Za mu iya yin hasashe ne kawai game da dalilan da suka sa masana kimiyya suka ɗauki ra'ayin zuriyar gama gari ba tare da wani zargi ba. Nasarar Darwiniyanci babu shakka ya kara martabar masana kimiyya, kuma ra'ayin tsari na atomatik ya yi daidai da ruhin zamanin wanda ka'idar ta samu gagarumin tallafi daga shugabannin addini. Ko ta yaya, masana kimiyya sun yarda da ka'idar kafin a gwada ta sosai, sannan suka yi amfani da ikonsu wajen gamsar da jama'a cewa tsarin halitta ya isa ya samar da mutum daga kwayoyin cuta da kwayoyin cuta daga cakuda sinadaran. Kimiyyar juyin halitta ta fara neman shaida mai goyan baya kuma ya fara fitar da bayanin da zai kawar da shaida mara kyau. (16)
Rubutun burbushin ya kuma karyata ka'idar Darwin. An dade da sanin cewa ba za a iya ganin ci gaba a hankali a cikin burbushin halittu ba, duk da cewa ka'idar juyin halitta na bukatar bullowar hankali, gabobin jiki da sabbin nau'ikan ta wannan. Alal misali, Steven M. Stanley ya bayyana cewa: "Babu misali ɗaya a cikin sanannun kayan burbushin halittu inda wani muhimmin sabon fasalin tsarin ke tasowa ga nau'in (17) Manyan masana burbushin halittu da yawa sun yarda da rashin ci gaba a hankali. Kasusuwan burbushin halittu ko nau'in zamani ba su nuna misalan ci gaban sannu a hankali da ka'idar Darwin ke bukata ba. A ƙasa akwai wasu sharhi daga wakilan gidajen tarihi na tarihi. Ya kamata gidajen tarihi na tarihin halitta su sami mafi kyawun shaida na juyin halitta, amma ba su. Na farko, sharhin Stephen Jay Gould, watakila shahararren masanin burbushin halittu na zamaninmu (Amurka Museum). Ya musanta ci gaba a hankali a cikin burbushin halittu:
Stephen Jay Gould: Ba na son ta kowace hanya in raina yuwuwar iyawar ra'ayin juyin halitta a hankali. Ina so kawai in lura cewa ba a taɓa yin 'lalle' a cikin duwatsu ba. (The Panda's Thumb, 1988, shafi na 182,183).
Dokta Etheridge, sanannen mai kula da Gidan Tarihi na Biritaniya: A cikin wannan gidan kayan gargajiya duka, babu wani abu mafi ƙanƙanta da zai tabbatar da asalin jinsin daga tsaka-tsaki. Ka'idar juyin halitta ba ta dogara ne akan lura da gaskiya ba. Dangane da maganar shekarun ’yan Adam, lamarin haka yake. Wannan gidan kayan gargajiya yana cike da shaidun da ke nuna yadda waɗannan ka'idodin suke da rashin hankali. (18)
Babu daya daga cikin jami'an da ke cikin manyan gidajen tarihi na burbushin halittu guda biyar da zai iya gabatar da ko da saukin misali guda daya na kwayoyin halitta wanda za a iya daukarsa a matsayin shaidar juyin halitta a hankali daga wannan nau'in zuwa wani. (Takaitacciyar Dr. Luther Sunderland a cikin littafinsa Darwin's enigma . Ya yi hira da wakilan gidajen tarihi na tarihi da yawa na wannan littafi kuma ya rubuta musu da nufin gano ko wace irin shaida ce suke da ita don tabbatar da juyin halitta. [19] )
Magana mai zuwa ta ci gaba akan wannan batu. Marigayi Dokta Colin Patterson babban masanin burbushin halittu ne kuma kwararre a burbushin halittu a gidan tarihi na Biritaniya (Tarihin Halitta). Ya rubuta littafi game da juyin halitta - amma lokacin da wani ya tambaye shi dalilin da ya sa littafinsa ba shi da hotunan tsaka-tsaki (kwayoyin halitta a cikin canji), ya rubuta amsa mai zuwa. A cikin amsarsa, ya yi nuni ga Stephen J. Gould, watakila shahararren masanin burbushin halittu a duniya (kara da cewa):
Na yarda gaba daya da ra'ayinku game da rashin misalai a cikin littafina game da kwayoyin halitta waɗanda suke cikin juyin halitta a matakin rikon kwarya. Idan na san irin wannan, na burbushin halittu ko na rayuwa, da da yardar rai zan saka su cikin littafina . Kuna ba da shawarar cewa in yi amfani da mai zane don kwatanta irin waɗannan tsaka-tsakin siffofi amma daga ina zai sami bayanai don zanensa? Maganar gaskiya, ba zan iya ba shi wannan bayanin ba, kuma idan na bar batun ga mai zane, shin ba zai kai mai karatu ba? Na rubuta rubutun littafina shekaru hudu da suka wuce [a cikin littafin ya gaya cewa ya gaskata da wasu sifofin tsaka-tsaki]. Idan zan rubuta shi yanzu, ina tsammanin littafin zai bambanta. A hankali (canzawa a hankali) ra'ayi ne wanda na yi imani da shi. Ba wai don darajar Darwin kawai ba amma don fahimtara game da kwayoyin halitta kamar yana bukatar hakan. Duk da haka, yana da wuya a yi da'awar a kan [Shahararren masanin burbushin halittu Stephen J.] Gould da sauran mutanen gidan kayan gargajiya na Amurka lokacin da suka ce babu tsaka-tsaki . A matsayina na masanin burbushin halittu, ina aiki da yawa tare da matsalolin falsafa lokacin gane tsoffin nau'ikan halittu daga kayan burbushin halittu. Kun ce ya kamata in gabatar da hoton burbushin halittu, wanda daga cikinsa ya samo asali. Ina magana kai tsaye - babu burbushin da zai zama shaida mara ruwa . (20)
Menene za a iya kammala daga abin da ke sama? Za mu iya mutunta Darwin a matsayinsa na ƙwararren masanin halitta, amma bai kamata mu yarda da zatonsa game da gadon jinsuna daga tantanin halitta na farko ba. Shaida a fili ta fi dacewa da halitta don haka nan da nan Allah ya shirya komai. Bambance-bambancen yana faruwa, kuma ana iya canza nau'in nau'in ta hanyar kiwo, amma duk wannan yana da iyaka wanda ba da jimawa ba. Ƙarshe ita ce, Darwin ya batar da kimiyya, kuma masana kimiyya waɗanda basu yarda da Allah ba sun bi shi. Ya fi dacewa a dogara ga ra’ayin tarihi cewa Allah ya halicci komai don kada ya taso da kansa. Wannan ra'ayi kuma yana goyon bayan gaskiyar cewa masana kimiyya ba su san maganin yadda rayuwa za ta iya tasowa da kanta ba. Wannan abu ne da za a iya fahimta saboda abu ne mai wuya. Rayuwa ce kawai za ta iya haifar da rayuwa, kuma ba a sami wani togiya ga wannan doka ba. Ga farkon halittar rayuwa, wannan a fili yana nufin Allah:
(Farawa 1:1) Tun farko Allah ya halicci sama da ƙasa.
- (Romawa 1: 19, 20) Domin abin da za a iya sani na Allah yana bayyana a cikinsu; domin Allah ya nuna musu. 20 Gama abubuwan da ba a iya gani nasa tun daga halittar duniya ana gani a sarari, ana fahimtar abubuwan da aka yi, har ma da ikonsa na har abada da Allahntakarsa. sabõda haka bã su uzuri .
- (Ru’ya ta Yohanna 4:11) Kai ne ka isa ka karɓi ɗaukaka da girma da iko, ya Ubangiji: gama kai ne ka halicci dukan abu, domin nufinka kuma sun kasance kuma an halicce su .
References:
1. Vishal Mangalwadi: Kirja, joka muutti maailmasi (The Book that Made Your World), p. 181,182,186 2. Usko, toivo ja terveys, p. 143, Article by Risto A. Ahonen 3. Matti Korhonen, Uusi tie 6.2.2014, p. 5. 4. John Dewey: ”The American Intellectual Frontier” New Republic, 10.5.1922, vol. 30, p. 303. Republic Publishing 1922 5. Noah J. Efron: Myytti 9: Kristinusko synnytti modernin luonnontieteen, p. 82,83 in book Galileo tyrmässä ja muita myyttejä tieteestä ja uskonnosta (Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion) 6. James Hannam: The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution 7. Malcolm Muggeridge: Jesus Rediscovered. Pyramid 1969. 8. David Bentley Hart: Ateismin harhat (Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and its Fashionable Enemies), p. 65 9. Lennart Saari: Haavoittunut planeetta, p. 104 10. James Hannam: The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution 11. O'Neill, T., The Dark Age Myth: An atheist reviews God's Philosophers, strangenotions.com, 17 October 2009 12. Ari Turunen: Ei onnistu, p. 201,202 13. Richard Dawkins: Sokea kelloseppä, p. 20 14. Darwin, F & Seward A. C. toim. (1903, 1: 184): More letters of Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 15. Christopher Booker: “The Evolution of a Theory”, The Star, Johannesburg, 20.4.1982, p. 19 16. Philip E. Johnson: Darwin on Trial, p. 152 17. Steven M. Stanley: Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. San Francisco: W.M. Freeman and Co. 1979, p. 39 18. Thoralf Gulbrandsen: Puuttuva rengas, p. 94 19. Sit. kirjasta "Taustaa tekijänoikeudesta maailmaan", Kimmo Pälikkö ja Markku Särelä, p. 19. 20. Carl Wieland: Kiviä ja luita (Stones and Bones), p. 15,16
|
Jesus is the way, the truth and the life
Grap to eternal life!
|
Other Google Translate machine translations:
Miliyoyin shekaru / dinosaurs / juyin
halittar mutum? |