1. Ingabe siyaphindukuzalwa?

Ngokuphathelene nemfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa, singathola ukungqubuzana okuningi okunengqondo kanye nezimpawu zemibuzo kuyo. Okufanayo kuyasebenza futhi ocwaningweni olwenziwa ngokuphindukuzalwa futhi olwenziwa kusetshenziswa i-hypnosis nezinkumbulo ezizenzakalelayo. Sizokufunda lokhu ngokulandela izibonelo ezilandelayo:

Kungani singakhumbuli? Umbuzo wokuqala futhi ofaneleka kakhulu mayelana nempilo yethu yangaphambili uthi; “Kungani ngokuvamile singakhumbuli lutho ngabo?” Uma ngempela sinochungechunge lwezimpilo zangesikhathi esidlule, bekungeke yini kube nengqondo ukuthi singakhumbula imininingwane eminingi yalokhu kuphila okudlule njengomndeni, izikole, izindawo zokuhlala, imisebenzi, ukuguga? Kungani singazikhumbuli lezi zinto ezimpilweni zethu zangaphambili, nakuba singakhumbula kalula amakhulu, ngisho nezinkulungwane zezenzakalo zalokhu kuphila? Ngakho-ke, ingabe lobu akubona ubufakazi obucacile bokuthi lezozimpilo zangaphambili azikaze zibe khona, ngoba uma kungenjalo ngokuqinisekile besiyozikhumbula? 

   Uma uyilungu lenhlangano yeNkathi Entsha futhi ukholelwa ekuzalweni kabusha, kufanele uzibuze ukuthi kungani ungakhumbuli lutho ngalezi mpilo zangaphambili. Futhi cabangela iqiniso lokuthi abalandeli abambalwa bokuphindukuzalwa bayaphika ukuthi kungenzeka ukuthi singakhumbula lezi zimpilo zangaphambili. Ngisho no-HB Blavatsky, umsunguli womphakathi we-theosophical, okungenzeka ngaphezu kwanoma ubani omunye wenza ukuphindukuzalwa kwaziwa emazweni aseNtshonalanga kuma-1800s, wazibuza ukuthi kungani singakhumbuli:

Mhlawumbe singasho ukuthi ekuphileni komuntu ofayo, akukho ukuhlupheka okunjalo komphefumulo nomzimba obekungeke kube isithelo nomphumela wesono esithile esenziwe esimweni sangaphambili sokuphila. Kodwa ngakolunye uhlangothi, impilo yakhe yamanje ayifaki ngisho neyodwa inkumbulo yalabo. (1)

Ukwanda kwabantu.  Inkinga yesibili okufanele sibhekane nayo ukukhula kwesibalo sabantu. Uma ukuphindukuzalwa kuyiqiniso futhi othile ehlala ezuza i-moksha futhi eshiya umjikelezo khona-ke inani labantu eMhlabeni kufanele lehle - noma okungenani akufanele likhuphuke. Ngamanye amazwi, manje kufanele kube nabantu abambalwa eMhlabeni kunangaphambili.

   Kungani isimo siphambene? Lapho inani labantu kufanele ngaso sonke isikhathi linciphe ngoba abantu bayawushiya umjikelezo, kunalokho, banda ngaso sonke isikhathi, kangangokuthi manje sekunabantu abaphindwe izikhathi ezingu-10 kuneminyaka engu-500 edlule futhi cishe izikhathi ezingu-30 ngaphezu kweminyaka engu-2,000 edlule. Empeleni, njengamanje kunabantu abaningi eMhlabeni kunanini ngaphambili futhi inani labo liye landa ngaso sonke isikhathi phakathi namakhulu eminyaka.

   Empeleni, ngeke kudingeke sibuyele emuva kunezinkulungwane zeminyaka - sisekela izibalo ekukhuleni kwamanje kwesibalo sabantu - ngaphambi kokuba sifinyelele iphuzu elinguziro lapho bekungeke kube khona abantu. (Qhathanisa noGenesise 1:28, “Zalani, nande, nigcwalise umhlaba...”).

   Ukwanda kwabantu kuyinkinga yangempela ngokombono wokuphindukuzalwa, ikakhulukazi uma imiphefumulo ethile ikhululiwe emjikelezweni. Lokhu akusekeli ukuphindukuzalwa; kuyayiphikisa.

Ukuphindukuzalwa kweMpumalanga naseNtshonalanga. Esinye isici sombono waseMpumalanga siwukuthi indoda ingaba isilwane noma isitshalo, kuyilapho emazweni aseNtshonalanga, abantu kucatshangwa ukuthi bangabantu. Umbono omdala nowangempela wase-Asia uhlanganisa zonke izinhlobo zokuphila; yingakho kubizwa ngokuthi ukufuduka kwemiphefumulo. Ngokwesibonelo, u-Olavi Vuori (ikhasi 82,  Hyvät henget ja pahat ) unikeze le ncazelo yenkolo ethandwayo yaseShayina:

Inkolo ethandwayo yaseShayina ihlanganisa nombono wokuphindukuzalwa. Ngemva kokudlula kuzo zonke izinkantolo, umphefumulo uzophinde ubuyele emhlabeni. Indlela umuntu azophinde azalwe ngayo incike empilweni yangaphambilini yomuntu. Labo abaphatha kabi izilwane ezifuywayo bayozalwa njengezilwane ezifuywayo. Ngenxa yalesi sizathu, amaShayina angokwenkolo awazibulali izilwane. ULaotse usevele weluleka ngokuthi, “Yiba nobungane ezilwaneni. Bangaba okhokho bakho."

Ngakho-ke singase sibuze ukuthi kungani lesi sici singazange sikhuliswe kakhulu eNtshonalanga? Kuyaqabukela - noma akakaze - sifunde ukuthi othile ube yinhlanzi noma i-bacterium, isibonelo, empilweni yakhe yangaphambili; futhi ubani owayengakhumbula ukuphila kwangaphambili njengesilwane? Omunye umbuzo obonakala usobala yilo: Uma sasiphila njengama- bacterium noma izihlahla phakathi nokuphila kwethu kwangaphambili, yini esayifunda ngaleso sikhathi? Ngokuqinisekile, amagciwane nezihlahla azinakho ukuqonda.  Abantu abaningi bakholelwa ukuthi babengamakhosi noma abanye abantu abaphawulekayo kodwa ezifundweni zokuphindukuzalwa, asivamile ukuzwa ukuthi othile ube yisilwane empilweni yakhe yangaphambili - lezi zinhlobo zezindaba azikho nhlobo.

   Singase sizibuze ngokufanelekile ukuthi kungani kunomehluko omkhulu kangaka phakathi kombono waseNtshonalanga nowaseMpumalanga. Ingabe lokho akubona obunye ubufakazi bokuthi abantu abawazi amaqiniso aphathekayo? Imibono yabo isekelwe ezinkolelweni okunzima noma okungenakwenzeka ukuba zibe yiqiniso.

Isikhawu phakathi kokuphindukuzalwa.  Okunye ukuphikisana phakathi kokuphindukuzalwa izikhawu ezihlukene phakathi kokuphindukuzalwa, isikhathi esichithwa kwamanye amazwe. Imibono iyahlukahluka kakhulu, kuye ngesiko noma umphakathi. Izibonelo ezilandelayo zibonisa lo mehluko:

- Emphakathini waseDruus eMpumalanga Ephakathi, abantu bakholelwa ekuphindukuzalwa okuqondile; asikho isikhawu.

- Emhlanganweni we-Rose Cross, ukuphindukuzalwa kulindeleke ukuthi kwenzeke njalo  eminyakeni eyi-144 .

- I-Anthroposophy ikholelwa ekuzalweni kabusha esikhathini esingangeminyaka engu-800.

- Abacwaningi bokuphindukuzalwa balinganisela ukuthi isikhawu ngokuvamile siphakathi kweminyaka emi-5 nengama-60.

Ngakho-ke umbuzo omuhle uwukuthi, iyiphi yale mibono nezinkolelo ezilungile, noma ingabe zonke ziyiphutha? Ingabe lokhu kuphikisana akufakazeli ukuthi laba bantu abanalo ulwazi oluyiqiniso ngalokhu, nokuthi kumane kuwumbuzo wezinkolelo ezingamanga zawo wonke umuntu? Mhlawumbe lezi zikhathi nezimpilo zangaphambili azikaze zibe khona.

   Enye inkinga engathi sína kakhulu ukuthi uma sesikwelinye izwe amashumi noma amakhulu eminyaka ngisho izikhathi eziningana, kungani singenakho noma yiziphi izinto esizikhumbulayo kubo? Kungani singazazi lezi zikhathi esizichitha ezweni lemimoya njengoba singazazi nempilo yethu yangaphambili? Abanye bachaza lokhu kungabikho kwenkumbulo ngokuthi mhlawumbe inkumbulo yethu isuliwe. Kodwa uma inkumbulo yethu yesulwa singabonisa kanjani ukuthi ukuphindukuzalwa kuyenzeka? Uma singakhumbuli lutho ekuphileni kwethu kwangaphambili kanye nezikhawu phakathi kwakho, ubufakazi obusekela ukuphindukuzalwa buhlala buncane kakhulu.

Ukuxhumana ngale komngcele kanye nokuphindukuzalwa.  Kuvamile ukuthi amalungu amaningi enhlangano yeNkathi Entsha akholelwa ekuphindukuzalwa akholelwa nokuthi athola imilayezo evela emimoyeni yabafileyo. Bakholelwa ngempela ukuthi bangahlotshaniswa nabafileyo, nakuba becabanga nokuthi ukuphindukuzalwa kuyiqiniso. Bangase bahlele izikhathi ezikhethekile zemimoya lapho bakholelwa ukuthi bathola imilayezo evela kubantu asebedlulele ngaphesheya komngcele. Ngokwesibonelo, omunye wabasebenzelana nemimoya owaziwa kakhulu, umufi uLeslie Flint, waqala ukuxhumana nabantu abanjengoMarilyn Monroe, uValentino, iNdlovukazi uVictoria, uMahatma Gandhi, uShakespeare, uChopin, nabanye abantu abadumile.

   Amalungu amaningi enhlangano yeNkathi Entsha angakunaki ukuthi lezi zindaba ezimbili - ukuphindukuzalwa kanye nokuxhumana nabafileyo - zingasebenza kanjani ngesikhathi esisodwa. Uma sizama ukuwahlanganisa sizoba nesiphithiphithi nje ezandleni zethu. Lokhu singakubona ezibonelweni ezilandelayo:

Obani esingase sixhumane nabo?  Ubunzima bokuqala ukukhomba umuntu esixhumana naye. Uma umuntu othile enezimo eziyishumi ezihlukene emhlabeni ngemuva kwakhe futhi esanda kudlulela ngaphesheya komngcele njengomuntu obizwa ngokuthi uMathewu, yimuphi kulaba bantu abayishumi esixhumana naye?

   Bheka uhlu olulandelayo oluchaza lokhu. Ukuzalwa komuntu kuhlelwe ngokulandelana kwezikhathi - amagama omuntu ofanayo kuphela aguqukayo phakathi nokuphila kwakhe okuhlukile. Ukuzalwa kwakhe kwakamuva eMhlabeni kwakunguMathewu kanti owokuqala kwakungu-Aaron.

1. Aroni

2. U-Adamu

3. Ian

4. Walt

5. URichard

6. Wayne

7. UJames

8. Edward

9. UWilliam

10. Mathewu

Inkinga iwukuthi lapho laba bantu abayishumi bengumuntu oyedwa ngempela, ingabe singabe sesixhumana nabo bonke abantu abayishumi noma noMathewu kuphela, owaba ngowokugcina ukuphila emhlabeni? Noma ingabe oyedwa kanye nomuntu ofanayo ngaphesheya komngcele udlala izindima ezihlukene ngokuvumelana nalokho okudingekayo, kangangokuthi ngezinye izikhathi uMathewu, ngezinye izikhathi u-Aroni, ngezinye izikhathi uRichard, futhi ngezinye izikhathi omunye umuntu? Kuyathakazelisa ukuthi labo abakholelwa ukuthi baxhumekile ngaphesheya komngcele abavamile ukuhlangana nezinkinga ezinjalo. Bahlale bekholelwa ukuthi baxhumana nabantu ababafunayo. Nokho, ngokukhanya kwalesi sibonelo, kuyangabazeka.

Kuthiwani uma lowo muntu esezelwe kabusha futhi ephila eMhlabeni manje?  Uma siqhubeka nendlela yangaphambili yokucabanga, singacabanga ukuthi lowo muntu onemizimba eyishumi ngemva kwakhe usephinde wazalwa emhlabeni njengomuntu omusha ngokuphelele; manje usebuyile njengoGary. Ngakho-ke, ungumzimba weshumi nanye womuntu ofanayo eMhlabeni.

   Inkinga kule ndaba enomusa ukuthi uma manje sizama ukuxhumana nomuntu oyedwa kwabayishumi ngaphambi kwalona wamanje (u-Aroni, uWilliam, njll, ogcina ngoMathewu), singaphumelela kanjani njengoba umuntu esephila emhlabeni? Isibonelo, u-Leslie Flint oshiwo ngenhla ukholelwa ukuthi wayexhumana noMarilyn Monroe nabanye abantu abadumile kodwa uma laba bantu base bevele baphinde bazalwa eMhlabeni, lokhu kuxhumana kwakungenziwa kanjani? Kwakungafanele yini kube yinto engenakwenzeka ngempela? (Bekungenzeka uma u-Leslie Flint ehlangane nalaba bantu eMhlabeni emizimbeni yabo entsha.)  Ngakho-ke, kunezinkinga ezinkulu uma sizama ukuhlanganisa la mafilosofi amabili.

Ingabe umuntu angakwazi ukuxhumana naye?  Singase futhi sibhekane nesimo lapho uGary, umzimba weshumi nanye, ezama ukuxhumana nomunye wokuzalwa kwakhe kwangaphambili. Kungenzeka ngempela ukuthi uzama ukuxhumana nomunye wezinto zakhe zangaphambilini noma ngisho nazo zonke ngesikhathi esisodwa. Umbuzo uthi kungenzeka kanjani lokho ngoba naye lo muntu useMhlabeni hhayi ngale komngcele? Lena inkinga yezindawo ezimbili: umuntu oyedwa angaba kanjani ezindaweni ezimbili ngesikhathi esisodwa? Siyabona ukuthi ngeke kwenzeke.

Kungani abantu besahamba emjikelezweni ? Ukuphindukuzalwa kuhilela umbono wokuthi sisemjikelezweni oqhubekayo wokuthuthuka, nokuthi umthetho we-karma uyasivuza futhi usijezise ngokuya ngendlela esiphile ngayo ezimpilweni zethu zangaphambili. Ukuziphatha okuphucuzekile nobuhle kufanele kukhule njalo emhlabeni njengoba sithuthuka.

Kodwa lapha kunenkinga enkulu mayelana nokuphindukuzalwa. Izwe alihambi ngaso sonke isikhathi endleleni engcono, kodwa lidlulela kokubi (njengoba uPawulu asho, “Kodwa phawula lokhu: Kuyoba khona izikhathi ezinzima ezinsukwini zokugcina. abaziqhenyayo, abahlambalazayo, abangalaleli abazali babo, abangabongiyo, abangcwele, 2 kuThimothi 3:1,2) Izinga lobugebengu alinciphi kodwa liyakhula.Endulo, emaphandleni kwakungadingeki ngaso sonke isikhathi ukukhiya iminyango noma ukugqekeza. ama-alamu ngenxa yokwesaba ukugqekezelwa, kodwa namuhla asetshenziswa.Ngokufanayo, ekhulwini elidlule, izimpi ezimbili ezibhubhisa kakhulu emlandweni wesintu ziye zalwiwa, zabulala izigidi zabantu.Uma kube khona intuthuko kulendawo, ibilokhu isezikhalini nobuchwepheshe kuphela, hhayi kubantu.

Ngakolunye uhlangothi, uma sekunezinkulungwane zabantu abazelwe enyameni ngemuva kwabo, akufanele yini ukuthi konke ukungabi nabulungisa sekuphelile manje? Uma i-karma embi kanye nokugula, ubumpofu nokunye ukuhlupheka kuhlale kuwumphumela wezenzo ezingalungile ezimpilweni zethu zangaphambili, akufanele yini ukuthi wonke umuntu ube esefundile kakade ngemiphumela yezenzo zabo phakathi nezinkulungwane zokuzalwa komuntu? Kungani, nokho, sise 'kumjikelezo' futhi kungani intuthuko ingaqhubekanga ngale kwalokho uma wonke umuntu esevele enolwazi olungenakubalwa lokufunda emiphumeleni yezenzo zakhe? Kukhona ukuphikisana okusobala lapha phakathi kwalokhu kokubili, futhi kungenye yezinto ezinamandla kakhulu ezikhuluma ngokumelene nokuphindukuzalwa.

Impilo yethu eMhlabeni nangale komngcele. Umqondo waseNtshonalanga wokuphindukuzalwa, ikakhulukazi, uhilela umbono wokuthi siwela umngcele njalo nje ukuze sichithe ikhefu ngemva kokufa kwethu. Ngaphezu kwalokho, uma kuziwa ekuphileni ngemva kokufa nangale komngcele, ngokuvamile kuchazwa emazweni asentshonalanga njengoba kugcwele umoya wokuzwana, ukuthula nothando. Isibonelo, encwadini eyaziwayo ethi "Kuolemaa ei ole" kaRauni Leena Luukanen lo mbono uvezwa ngokucacile. Isicaphuno esilandelayo sivela encwadini (ikhasi 209, 221), lapho okuthiwa "ugogo" womlobi edlulisela umlayezo ovela ngaphesheya komngcele ngokubhala okuzenzakalelayo (Eqinisweni, kwakuwumoya okhohlisayo owavela njengogogo womlobi) .Lo myalezo ubhekisela ekuphileni okungaphezu komngcele, okusuke kuqhathaniswa nendawo engenalo uthando nebandayo emhlabeni:

Uthando luhlanganisa abantu. Amagama, ukushukuma komzimba, nezincazelo akudingekile. Alukho uthando lwenyama. Lonke uthando lungokomoya. Abantu bayathandana ngendlela efanayo kungakhathaliseki ukuthi bangamadoda, abesifazane noma izingane. Uthando lweqiniso lunjalo naseMhlabeni kodwa lubonakaliswa ngezindlela ezahlukene ngenxa yemizimba yethu elinganiselwe.

   Abantu Emhlabeni bahlala endaweni engenalo uthando nebandayo. Emhlabeni siyafunda nokho, lapha kumele sibuyele kaningi ukuze sifunde isifundo sothando lweqiniso, sifunde futhi siziphathe ngokukhula kwethu, sikhonze futhi sithande omakhelwane bethu.

   (…) Emhlabeni umuntu akakwazi ukucabanga uthando nobuhle kwelinye iqiniso. Lapho abantu beza lapha, bamangazwa imibala, ukuthula, nobuhle obungenakuchazwa ngamazwi nje.

Nokho, uma ukuphila ngale komngcele kunjena (kuthiwani ngabenzi bobubi abangaphenduki okungenzeka bahlukumeza abanye, abantu abanjengoHitler owayenecala lokubulala izigidi; ingabe babhekana nesimo esifanayo?) pho kungani kungenzeki isimo esifanayo lapha eMhlabeni. ? Uma sonke sedlule umngcele lapho zonke izinto zihlukile, kungani into efanayo ingenzeki nalapha eMhlabeni? Lokhu akumele kube yinkinga ngoba umbuzo wokuthi abantu abafanayo bakhona lapha nalapha - yindawo kuphela eshintshile.

   Lena enye futhi inkinga yokuphindukuzalwa; kungani abantu abafanayo behlala kulezi zindawo ezimbili ngezindlela ezihluke ngokuphelele; bashintshana baziphathe kahle futhi kabi, kuye ngendawo yokuhlala. Kuyinkinga enkulu njengoba nje singakhumbuli lutho ngezikhawu noma izimpilo zethu zangaphambili.

Kungani kuzalwe eMhlabeni uma kungenasidingo?  Ikakhulukazi emazweni aseNtshonalanga bafundisa ukuthi ukuphila ngemva kokufa kuyinjabulo, ukuthula, kanye nokukhululeka kuwo wonke amaketanga ezinto ezibonakalayo (sibhekisele kulokhu kakade endimeni esandulele), nokuthi singahlala sikhetha ukuthi siyophindukuzalwa nini eMhlabeni. , ikakhulukazi "ngenxa yokukhula kwethu kwengqondo." Lokhu kungabonakala, ngokwesibonelo, ku-  Mitä on New Age?  (nguKati Ojala, ikhasi 22). Incwadi ithi singakhetha ngisho nezimo zokuphila lapho sizalwa kabusha eMhlabeni.

  Futhi ngenxa yabo, sizoyishiya i-astral ngemva kwesikhathi esithile futhi sibuyele ezingeni eliphansi lokudlidliza, sibe yindaba engokwenyama kanye nokuvela okusha. Nokho, ngaphambi kwalokho sizokhetha izimo kanye nenkathi yokuphila kwethu kwesikhathi esizayo.

  (…) Sikhetha abazali bethu, abangani, omakhelwane...

Nokho, uma ukuphila ngemva kokufa kuyinjabulo nokuthula, kungani singafuna ukuphindukuzalwa sibuyele eMhlabeni? Uma sazi ukuthi kukhona ukuhlupheka okusilindile ngenxa yekarma embi (ngokwesibonelo, uHitler nabanye abenzi bobubi abaningi), akekho ongafuna ukuphinde azalwe eMhlabeni. Singathanda ukuchitha "izinsuku zenjabulo" ngaphesheya komngcele - njengoba sinobugovu - futhi ngeke sibuye lapha. Khona-ke, uMhlaba wawuyobe ushiywe ngokuphelele futhi ngeke kube khona isixuku esikhulu samanje sabantu.

   Kuyangabazeka futhi ukuthi singaphinde sizalwe lapha ngenxa yesifiso sethu sokuthuthukiswa kwengqondo. Lokhu kuyangabazeka ngoba mhlawumbe abantu abangamaphesenti angu-90 abakaze bacabange ngakho. Ukube bekuyisizathu esibaluleke kakhulu sokuphindukuzalwa kwethu, bekuyothatha izingqondo zethu kusukela ekuqaleni, kodwa akunjalo.

   Inkinga eyodwa ebonakala ikakhulukazi kumbono waseNtshonalanga wokuphindukuzalwa ukuthi akuhambisani nombono wokuqala wase-Asia. EMpumalanga, umgomo uwukushiya umjikelezo kodwa kungani befuna ukuphindukuzalwa eMhlabeni uma sebewufezile umgomo wabo? Babezofinyelela umgomo wabo ngokumane banqume ukuthi bangaphinde bazalwe eMhlabeni. EMpumalanga, abakholelwa kulokhu okungenzeka, futhi lo mbono uphinde ungomunye walokho kuphikisana okuvela emfundisweni yokuphindukuzalwa.

Usebenza kanjani umthetho we-karma? Uma sibheka izimfihlakalo zokuphindukuzalwa, enye yazo umthetho we-karma. Ngokombono ojwayelekile, kufanele isebenze ukuze ihlale ivuza noma ijezise abantu ngendlela abayiphile impilo yabo yangaphambili. Uma umuntu enze izinto ezimbi noma ecabanga imicabango emibi, umphumela wakho uyoba mubi; ngakolunye uhlangothi, imicabango emihle iyophumela ekukhuleni okuhle.

   Nokho, imfihlakalo iwukuthi noma yimuphi umthetho ongeyena umuntu ungasebenza kanjani kanjalo. Awekho amandla angeyena umuntu noma umthetho ongacabanga, wehlukanise phakathi kwezenzo, noma ukhumbule noma yini esiyenzile - njengoba nje incwadi yemithetho ingeke ikwenze lokho: uhlala udinga umabi womthetho, umuntu; umthetho nje ungekwenze lokho.

   Futhi umthetho ongeyena umuntu awukwazi ukwenza izinhlelo zokuphila kwethu kwesikhathi esizayo noma unqume izimo esizozalwa futhi siphile kuzo. Le misebenzi ihlale idinga umuntu, futhi umthetho we-karma awuyena umuntu. Umthetho nje ungasebenza kanjani ngale ndlela eshiwo ngenhla?

   Inkinga yesibili ukuthi uma umthetho we-karma uzosivuza futhi usijezise njalo ngokuya ngendlela esiphile ngayo empilweni yethu yangaphambili, kungani singenakukhumbula lutho mayelana nesikhathi esidlule? Uma sijeziswa ngenxa yempilo yethu yangaphambili, kufanele sazi nokuthi kungani sijeziselwa. Siyini isisekelo somthetho uma izizathu zokujeziswa zingacaci? Lena enye yalezo zimfihlakalo nezimpawu zombuzo ezixhunywe emfundisweni yokuphindukuzalwa.

Kuthiwani ngesiqalo?  Ngenhla, sicabangele i-karma embi edalwe kuphela kule mpilo yasemhlabeni. Sifunde ukuthi ukuphindukuzalwa kusho ukuthi sibuyela lapha eMhlabeni ngokuphindaphindiwe, nokuthi ukuphindukuzalwa kwethu kuhlala kusekelwe endleleni esasiphila ngayo ngaphambili. Ngokuvamile kucatshangwa, okungenani eMpumalanga, ukuthi i-karma yezimpilo zangaphambili inquma isiphetho sethu kanye nendima yethu kulokhu kuphila. Ngoba i-karma embi ingumphumela wempilo yethu yangaphambili abantu abazama ukuyiqeda, ikakhulukazi eMpumalanga. Umgomo wabo uwukukhululwa ekuphindukuzalwa ukuze bangabe besaphinda bazalwe eMhlabeni. Isibonelo, uBuddha wafundisa ukuthi umgwaqo onezingxenye eziyisishiyagalombili ungenye yezindlela zokwenza lokhu.

   Iphuzu elilodwa abantu abangajwayele ukucabanga ngalo yisiqalo. Isiqalo sasinjani, lapho kungekho muntu owayengahlali eMhlabeni futhi ingekho i-karma embi ngenxa yezimpilo zangaphambili? Endaweni ethile kufanele kube nesiqalo, kungabi nalutho futhi kungabikho muntu emhlabeni.

   Umbuzo omuhle uwukuthi: kwakuyini indawo yokuqala? Umlando oqinisekisiwe wesintu awubuyeli emuva eminyakeni engaphezu kuka-5,000 lapho ukulima, ikhono lokubhala, izitsha zobumba, izakhiwo namadolobhana kwakhiwa. Futhi imbulunga, ukuphila okusebusweni bayo, noma iLanga ngeke kube phakade - ngaphandle kwalokho amandla agcinwe iLanga kanjalo nokuphila eMhlabeni ngabe kwaphela kudala.

   Ngakho-ke enye imfihlakalo ukuthi "i-karma embi" yaqala kanjani ukubonakala? Kwaqala kanjani ukuba nomthelela ezimpilweni zethu eMhlabeni, ngoba besingenazo izimpilo zangaphambili ebesingakuthola kuzo? Ngokuvamile siholela ekukholweni ukuthi kufanele phakathi nalokhu kuphila sivune lokho esikutshalile ezimpilweni zethu zangaphambili kodwa uma, ekuqaleni, zazingekho izimpilo ezandulele pho ingaba kanjani le mfundiso mayelana nomthetho we-karma? Eqinisweni, lokhu bekuyosho ukuthi uma thina ekuqaleni sasingenayo i-karma embi ezimpilweni zethu zangaphambili ngabe ngabe sesivele siphelele futhi besingeke sibe khona isidingo somjikelezo wokuphindukuzalwa. Uma kuyiqiniso, umjikelezo wadalwa kanjani uma kuphela i-karma embi evela ezimpilweni zethu ezimbi zangaphambili idala futhi iqhubeke? Bekuyini umqalisi?

   La maphuzu angachazwa ngesicaphuna esilandelayo. Kubhekiselwa ekutheni umjikelezo ungase uqale kanjani phakathi kodwa awubheki inkinga yasekuqaleni. Umbhali wale ncazelo uxoxa nezindela zamaBuddha:

Ngahlala ethempelini lamaBuddha lasePu-ör-an neqembu lezindela. Ingxoxo yaphenduka umbuzo wokuthi umoya womuntu uvelaphi. (…) Enye yezindela yanginika incazelo ende neningilizayo mayelana nomjikelezo omkhulu wokuphila ogeleza ngokuqhubekayo phakathi kwezinkulungwane nezigidi zeminyaka, uvela ngezindlela ezintsha, ezithuthukayo noma eza phansi, kuye ngekhwalithi yezenzo zomuntu ngamunye. Lapho le mpendulo ingangigculisi, enye yezindela yaphendula, “Umphefumulo uvela kuBuddha uvela ezulwini lasentshonalanga.” Ngabe sengibuza, “Uvelaphi uBuddha futhi umphefumulo womuntu uvela kanjani kuye?” Lapho kwaba yinkulumo ende futhi ngoBuddha bangaphambili nabesikhathi esizayo abazolandelana ngemva kwesikhathi eside, njengomjikelezo ongapheli. kodwa kungeyisikho kwasekuqaleni. Usuvele unaye uBuddha ozelwe kulo mhlaba bese usunomunye uBuddha olungile. Unomuntu ophelele odlula umjikelezo wakhe izikhathi ezingapheli. " Bengifuna ukuthola impendulo ecacile nefushane embuzweni wami: uvelaphi umuntu wokuqala noBuddha wokuqala? Uqale kuphi umjikelezo omkhulu wentuthuko?

    (…) Azikho izindela eziphendulayo, zathula zonke. Ngemva kwesikhashana ngathi, "Ngizonitshela lokhu, nakuba ningagcini inkolo efanayo neyami. Isiqalo sokuphila nguNkulunkulu. Akafani noBuddha benu abathi njengochungechunge olungapheli balandelana emjikelezweni omkhulu. yentuthuko kodwa uyafana phakade futhi akaguquki. Uyisiqalo sakho konke, futhi kuvela Kuye ukuqala komoya womuntu." (…) Angazi noma impendulo yami yabagculisa yini. Nokho, ngathola ithuba lokukhuluma nabo ngomthombo wokuphila, uNkulunkulu ophilayo okuphela kwakhe okukwazi ukuxazulula inkinga yomthombo wokuphila nemvelaphi yendawo yonke. (2)  

2. Ukuhlola ukuphindukuzalwa

Uma umuntu ezifundile izincwadi nezincwadi zeNkathi Entsha emkhakheni wokuphindukuzalwa, kungenzeka ukuthi ngokuvamile uye wathola kulezi zincwadi izifundo eziye zenziwa kule ndawo. Kungenzeka ukuthi uye waqaphela ukuthi izindlela ezimbili ezivame kakhulu ezifundweni zokuphindukuzalwa kube yi-hypnosis kanye nokukhumbula okuzenzakalelayo.

   Ukuze uthole omunye umbono ngalezi zindlela, kuhle ukufunda imigqa elandelayo. Phela, lezi zindlela azithembekile kakhulu futhi aziphelele. Okokuqala sibheka ukusetshenziswa kwe-hypnosis:

 Ukusetshenziswa kwe-hypnosis

Akuyona imodi evamile . Isizathu sokuqala sokungabaza ukusetshenziswa kwe-hypnosis ukuthi akusona isimo sethu esivamile. Akusona isimo sethu esijwayelekile lapho sijwayele ukwenza, sicabange futhi sikhumbule. Asiqali ukukhumbula izinto ngisho nasemaphusheni ethu, kodwa kuphela lapho siphapheme. Lokhu kuyasebenza nasezifundweni ezijwayelekile esizenzayo ezikoleni nakwezinye izindawo. Kwenzeka njalo uma siphapheme, hhayi ebuthongweni.

    Ngakho-ke, uma izimpilo zangaphambilini zaziyiqiniso, kufanele futhi zikhunjulwe esimweni esivamile sokuvuka futhi hhayi kuphela ekuluthweni, okungesona isimo sethu esivamile. Iqiniso lokuthi asizikhumbuli lenza umuntu azibuze ukuthi sake saphila yini.

Ukungazi lutho . Enye inkinga nge-hypnosis ukuthi i-subconscious yethu ingabandakanyeka. Kungenzeka ukuthi ukwaziswa okutholakala kuseshini akuveli empilweni edlule, kodwa kunoveli noma enye into umuntu oluthiwe ngezinye izikhathi ayifundayo. Amathuba la ahlala ekhona.

    Incwadi kaHarold Rosen ethi “A Scientific Report on the Search for Bridey Murphy” inikeza isibonelo esihle secala elinjalo:

Isibonelo, ku-hypnosis indoda yaqala ukukhuluma ulimi lwesi-Indo-European Oski, olwalukhulunywa eCampani , e-Italy phakathi nekhulu ^le- 3  ngaphambi kukaKristu. Angabhala nenhlamba eyodwa ngesi-Oski. Kamuva kwabonakala ngemva kwezikhathi ezimbalwa zokuluthwa ingqondo ukuthi le ndoda yayisanda kuvula incwadi yolimi lolimi lwase-Oski emtatsheni wezincwadi. Ukungazi kahle kwakhe kwakukhumbule izisho eziningi zolimi lwase-Oski, ezabe "zivela" ngaphansi kokuluthwa.

Ukuzilungisela indima.  Inkinga yesithathu nge-hypnosis yukuthi mhlawumbe umuntu okhohlisiwe ulungisa kuphela indima okulindeleke kuye futhi uphendula kuphela iziphakamiso ze-hypnotist. Abacwaningi abaningi bacabanga ukuthi i-95% ye-hypnosis idlala indima kuphela futhi ivumelana nomlahlisi (Bradbury Will, s. 174,  In i det okända , Reader's Digest, Sthlm 1983). Ngisho nomcwaningi odumile wokuphindukuzalwa u-Ian Stevenson uvumile ukuthi ukwenza indima nokulungisa intando ye-hypnotist kungenzeka ngaphansi kwe-hypnosis:

"Izici 'zobuntu' ezazivame ukwenziwa ziphile phakathi 'nempilo yangaphambili' ebangelwa ukuluthwa ingqondo zibonakala zinezici ezihluke kakhulu. Kungenzeka zazihlanganisa okuthile ngobuntu bomuntu ngaleso sikhathi, lokho ayekulindele kulokho ayecabanga ukuthi umlahlisi owayekulindele. kuye, izithombe zakhe ezingqondweni zalokho impilo yakhe yangaphambili okufanele ngabe yayiyiyo, futhi mhlawumbe nezinto ezingajwayelekile." (3)

Imimoya engaziwa.  Ingozi yesine nge-hypnosis ukuthi kulezi zikhathi, abantu bathintana nemimoya engaziwa, futhi ulwazi luvela kuyo. Lokhu kuthetheleleka kakhulu ngoba abantu abaningi abaluthwa kalula baye bahlangabezana nezimo eziningi ezingavamile ekuphileni kwabo, ezifana nalezo ezitholakala kumimoya.

  UHelen Wambach oyingqalabutho ekuhloleni  izimpilo  zangaphambili ezingase zibe khona ngokusebenzisa i-hypnosis naye uvumile ukuthi ukugxambukela kwemimoya kungenzeka ekuluthweni. Wathi:

Ngazi abantu abaningi abake babhekana nemimoya, abacabanga ukuthi ukungenwa idemoni kuyingozi ngempela kubantu abaluthwa ingqondo. (…) Ngicishe ngadukiswa. Lapho imimoya, imiyalezo eyinqaba, nokubhala okuzenzakalelayo kuqala ukuvela ngezikhathi zemimoya, ngafunda okuningi kunalokho engangikulindele. (4)

Izikhumbuzo ezizenzekelayo

Ngaphezu kokuluthwa ingqondo, ukuphindukuzalwa kuye kwahlolwa  ngalokho  okubizwa ngokuthi yizinkumbulo ezizenzakalelayo. Ngezinye izikhathi singakwazi ukuzwa izincazelo ezinembe kakhulu kumuntu, ngokuvamile ingane, ocabanga ukuthi ube ngomunye umuntu futhi ekhuluma ngempilo yangaphambili. Ubuthakathaka kule ndlela okungenani yilokhu okulandelayo:

Abantu abaningi abakhumbuli lutho.  Inkinga embi kakhulu ukuthi iningi labantu alizikhumbuli ngempilo yalo yangaphambili. Ngisho no-HB Blavatsky, owayengumsunguli womphakathi we-theosophical futhi owaletha imfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa eNtshonalanga, wavuma lokhu. Uma ngempela siye saphila izimpilo zangaphambili, kufanele futhi sizikhumbule. Kodwa kungani singakwazi?

Iboshelwe esikweni . Okwesibili esikubonayo esingakuphawula ukuthi kubophezelekile emasikweni nasekulindelweni ngabantu. Lapho abantu bekholelwa ekuphindukuzalwa, siphinde sithole izikhumbuzo eziningi kodwa zimbalwa zazo emazweni aseNtshonalanga. Ngaphezu kwakho konke atholakala phakathi kwalabo bantu abakholelwa ekuzalweni kabusha okuseduze ngemva kokufa. Ngenxa yokuhlangana kwamasiko, kungacatshangelwa ngempela ukuthi izinkumbulo zinenani, njengoba zingenzeki emazweni asentshonalanga.

Okunye ukuxhumana.  Abantu abaningi “abanenkumbulo yokuphindukuzalwa” baye babhekana nezimo ezingavamile, okusenza singabaze ukuthi umbuzo wemimoya kuphela. Kungenzeka ukuthi abantu bathola ukwaziswa kwabo kule mimoya engaziwa futhi akuwona umbuzo wokuphindukuzalwa kwangempela.

   Ngisho no-Ian Stevenson, umcwaningi owaziwa kakhulu wezinkumbulo, uye wavuma ukuthi izimo eziningi eziye zathathwa njengobufakazi bokuphindukuzalwa empeleni zingaba mayelana nezenzakalo zemilingo futhi zixhunywe nemimoya engaziwa. Ngaphezu kwalokhu, uStevenson wathola incwadi evulekile evela kuHinduswami (Sri Sri Somasundara Desika Paramachariya) evela eNingizimu India. Kule ncwadi, amaHinduswami amxwayisa ngokuthi kungenzeka okukhulunywe ngenhla. Wabhala:

Alikho kulawo macala angama-300 ongitshele ngawo asekela ukuphindukuzalwa. (…) Kulezo, kungumbuzo wokuba ngaphansi kwamandla omoya, amadoda ahlakaniphile aseNingizimu yeNdiya angawazisi kakhulu. (5)

Ukuphila njengomuntu oyedwa.  Isici esikhethekile sezindaba zokuphindukuzalwa yilezo zimo lapho izingane ezimbili zikhumbula ukuthi zaphila njengomuntu oyedwa. Kwakunjalo ngo-Said Bouhamsy, u-Ian Stevenson aye wafunda ngokucophelela.

    U-Bouhamsy wayengumDruze owashona engozini yemoto ngo-1943. Ingxenye yonyaka ngemva kokufa kwakhe, udadewabo wabeletha indodana eyacishe yasho amagama ezingane zikaBouhamsy ngamazwi akhe okuqala. Umfana wakwazi futhi ukutshela ngengozi eyaqeda "impilo yakhe yangaphambili", futhi iminyaka eminingi wayesaba kakhulu amaloli.

    Ukuphela kwenkinga yayiwukuthi kamuva, ngo-1958, kwazalwa omunye umfana endaweni eqhele ngamakhilomitha angu-50, naye owaqala ukukhumbula ukuphila kwakhe kwangaphambili njengo-Said Bouhamsy! Wakhumbula ingozi nenombolo yezingane zakhe nezinto ezinjalo. Naye waba novalo olubi ngenxa yamaloli.

    Ngakho, uma kuziwa ezimweni ezinjalo lapho abantu ababili bekhumbula ukuthi bake baphila njengomuntu oyedwa, akunakwenzeka ukuzichaza ngokuphindukuzalwa. Okungenani ngeke kube isizathu sokuthi abantu ababili bakhumbule ukuphila kwabo njengomuntu oyedwa. Mhlawumbe nakulezi zimo, kuyindaba yokuwela ngaphansi kwamandla omoya.

Umuntu usaphila.  Ngezinye izikhathi kuyenzeka ukuthi ingane ikhumbule ukuphila kwayo kwangaphambili njengomuntu osaphila! Leli kwakuyicala elingaqondakali likaJasbir Lali, elinye elahlolwa ngu-Ian Stevenson.

   Ngo-1954 lapho u-Jasbir eneminyaka engu-3.5 ubudala, wacishe wabulawa yingxibongo futhi ngemva nje kokululama ekuguleni waqala ukukhuluma ngokuthi empilweni yakhe yangaphambili wayengumfana ovela edolobhaneni elingumakhelwane laseSobha Ram. Watshela imininingwane enembile ngokuphila kwakhe njengalowo mfana; izinto obekungahlolwa ubuqiniso bazo.

   Nokho, endabeni kaJasbir Lali inkinga yayiwukuthi uSobha Ram wayengafanga ngaphambi kokuzalwa kukaJasbir; washona lapho uJasbir eneminyaka engu-3 ubudala.

   Ngakho-ke, leli cala alikwazi ukuthi limayelana nokuphindukuzalwa ngoba umuntu wayesaphila. Kufanele kube nenye incazelo.

AmaNapoleon amaningi.  Kubuye kube namacala angenakwenzeka futhi ahlekisayo ngokuphindukuzalwa. Ngokwesibonelo, eMelika singathola abantu abaningi abathi baye baphila njengoCleopatra noma uNapoleon! Bathi bake baphila njengoCleopatra noma uNapoleon nakuba kwakukhona iCleopatra eyodwa kanye neNapoleon eyodwa emlandweni womhlaba. Kufanele futhi siqaphele ukuthi kunabantu abangaphezu kwekhulu abathi baye baphila njengo-HB Blavatsky, umsunguli womphakathi we-theosophical!

   Umbuzo omuhle okufanele uzibuze wona mayelana nalezi zimo ukuthi: ingabe izikhumbuzo ezizenzakalelayo ziye zaxutshwa? Siyini isisekelo salezi zimangalo? Lesi sici esikhethekile saphinde saqashelwa nguDaniel Home, omunye wemithombo yezindaba edume kakhulu ngesikhathi sakhe. Wahlangana no-Alexander the Greats angamashumi amabili phakathi kwabanye abantu abaphawulekayo, isibonelo. Singaqonda ukuthi lezi zinhlobo zezinkumbulo azikwazi ukuba yiqiniso:

Ngiye ngaba nenjabulo yokuhlangana okungenani no-Marie Antoinettes abayishumi nambili, uMary abayisithupha noma abayisikhombisa, iNdlovukazi yaseScots, iqembu lonke likaLouis the Greats namanye amakhosi amaningi, kanye no-Alexander the Greats abangaba ngamashumi amabili, kodwa akakaze abe umuntu ojwayelekile njengoJohn Smith. Ngingathanda ngempela ukuhlangabezana necala elingajwayelekile.

Amacala asemngceleni , ukuvakasha ngale komngcele wokufa, akufakwanga kanjalo ezikhumbuzweni zempilo yangaphambilini, kodwa kungaphinde kuphikisane nokuphindukuzalwa. Ngakho, uMaurice Rawlings, ngokwesibonelo, owayengudokotela iminyaka engaba ngu-35 futhi elandela izimo zengozi yokufa nokufa okuzumayo, wathi njengodokotela akakaze abuthole ubufakazi bokuphindukuzalwa lapho exoxa nabantu. Wabhala encwadini yakhe ethi Rajan taakse ja takaisin (p. 106, To Hell and Back):

Kuyathakazelisa ukuthi angikaze ngibone kunoma imiphi imibono lapho ngisokhukhweni lokufa ngisho nokukodwa okubhekisela ekuzalweni kabusha, abantu ababuyela eMhlabeni ngokuphindukuzalwa, noma baqhubeke behlala kumuntu othile owayesevele ezelwe. Lo mqondo 'wobunikazi' wanikezwa ngokungalindelekile isazi sokuphindukuzalwa u-Ian Stevenson njengencazelo yokuphila kulabo asebevele bazalwa."

3. Ukuphindukuzalwa noma ukuphila okuphakade?

INGABE IBHAYIBHELI LIFUNDISA NGOKUZALALA ? I Uma umuntu efunde izincwadi ezikhuluma ngokuphindukuzalwa, kungenzeka ukuthi uye wathola umqondo wokuthi iBhayibheli lifundisa nokuphindukuzalwa noma ukuthi lasuswa kukho ngesikhathi esithile, mhlawumbe ngonyaka ka-553 phakathi noMkhandlu waseConstantinople.

   Kodwa ingabe lolu lwazi luyiqiniso noma cha? Sizocubungula lokhu ngokulandela ulwazi olulandelayo:

UMkhandlu waseConstantinople ngo-553. Okokuqala, lapho kucatshangwa ukuthi imfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa yasuswa enkolweni yobuKristu kanye neBhayibheli eMkhandlwini ka-553, akulona iqiniso. Kulo mhlangano, empeleni abazange bakhulume ngokuphindukuzalwa, kodwa mayelana nokuba khona komphefumulo ngaphambili, okwakuyimfundiso ka-Origen eyayimelwe. Kwanqatshwa emhlanganweni.

    Ngakho ukuphindukuzalwa akuzange kususwe eBhayibhelini, ngoba akuzange kube khona. Ngisho no-Origen ngokwakhe wayilahla emibhalweni yakhe imfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa, njengoba kwakwenziwa obaba besonto abaningana ngaphambi kwakhe. Okungukuthi, encwadini yakhe ehlaziya iVangeli likaMathewu, wazindla ngobuhlobo phakathi kukaJohane uMbhapathizi nomprofethi u-Eliya (Bheka izigaba ezimbalwa ngaphambili!) kodwa wathi lokhu kwakungahlangene nhlobo nokuphindukuzalwa, “okuyimfundiso eyinqaba. ebandleni likaNkulunkulu elingaveli kubaPhostoli futhi elingaveli ndawo eBhayibhelini.

Umbhalo wesandla uthola. Umbono wokuthi ukuphindukuzalwa kwaqedwa ngo-553 eMkhandlwini awunasisekelo futhi ngoba imibhalo yesandla etholwe ngaphambi kwesikhathi okukhulunywa ngayo, ayibonisi ukuthi iBhayibheli laba noshintsho. Ngokuphambene, le mibhalo yesandla etholakele ibonisa ukuthi iBhayibheli liye lasinda lisesesimweni esikulo manje, esingakusekeli ukuphindukuzalwa. (Isamba esingaphezu kuka-24000 sazo sitholwe ngesiGreki nezinye izinguqulo zakuqala, kusukela ku-100 kuya ku-400 AD. Leli nani likhulu uma sicabangela ukuthi umbhalo olandelayo owawukopishwe kakhulu kwakuyi-Iliad kaHomer: kuphela imibhalo yesandla engu-643 ekhona. . Lokho kusho ukuthi namuhla sinemibhalo yesandla yeBhayibheli yasendulo cishe izikhathi ezingu-40 kuneye-Iliad.)

    Kuyaphawuleka futhi ukuthi lonke iTestamente Elisha, ngaphandle kwamavesi angu-11, lingakhiwa kabusha ngokucaphuna obaba besonto abalondolozwe eminyakeni engu-300 ngemva kwesikhathi sikaJesu. Ngokocwaningo olwenziwa iBritish Museum, manje sekunezingxenye ezilinganiselwa ku-89,000 eziye zafakwa emibhalweni yesonto lokuqala lase-Ut. Le nombolo inkulu futhi ibonisa ukuthi ingakanani i-Ut esetshenziswe kakade ezinsukwini zokuqala. Izingcaphuno zibonisa nokuthi iTestamente Elisha lisalokhu lisesimweni esikuso manje, elingakusekeli ukuphindukuzalwa.

UJohane uMbhapathizi kanye nomprofethi u-Eliya. Isiqephu esisodwa esivame ukucashunwa izimfihlakalo eziningi zaseMpumalanga namalungu enhlangano yeNkathi Entsha amazwi kaJesu ngoJohane uMbhapathizi engu-Eliya ( Mathewu 11:11-14 noMarku 9:11-13 ). Bacabanga ukuthi lokhu kuzofakazela ukuphindukuzalwa.

    Nokho, kuhle ukuqaphela ukuthi isib uLuka 1:17 ubonisa ukuthi uJohane wahamba ngaphambi kukaJesu “emoyeni nangamandla ka-Eliya”. Ngamanye amazwi, wayenokugcotshwa okufanayo okuthonywe uMoya njengomanduleli wakhe eTestamenteni Elidala, kodwa wayengumuntu ohlukile ngokuphelele.

    Ngaphezu kwalokho, ubufakazi obusobala bokuthi uJohane wayengeyena nhlobo u-Eliya ngamazwi akhe lapho ephika lokhu. Impela wayemazi kangcono ukuthi ungubani, ngoba wathi: 

 ( Johane 1:21 ) Bambuza bathi: “Pho? Ungu-Elias? Wathi: "Angisiye." Ungulowomprofethi na? Yaphendula yathi: Hatshi. 

Ukufa kanye . Uma sibheka imfundiso yeBhayibheli evamile, nayo ayikusekeli ukuphindukuzalwa. Kuyenzeka ukuthi sithole amashumi noma amakhulu amavesi asikisela ukuthi singasindiswa ngomusa kuphela (Efe 2:8,9: Ngokuba ngomusa nisindisiwe ngokukholwa; nalokhu akuveli kini, kuyisipho. kaNkulunkulu: Akuveli ngemisebenzi , funa kube khona ozibongayo.) , ngoJesu nokuthi kungenzeka ngomuntu ukuba athethelelwe izono zakhe njengamanje. Lokhu kungqubuzana ngokucacile nemfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa, lapho umuntu kancane kancane ezama ukuzisindisa ngokuphila okuningana nokuthuthuka kancane kancane.

    Kuyaphawuleka futhi ukuthi uma kuziwa ekuqhubekeleni phambili kokuba khona ngemva kokufa, iBhayibheli alikhulumi ngokuphindukuzalwa emzimbeni omusha, kodwa ngokulahlwa nezulu nokwahlulelwa phambi kwakho - lezi zinto azikufaki nhlobo ukuphindukuzalwa. Ukwahlulela kwenzeka ngemva kokufa komuntu kanye - hhayi izikhathi eziningi:

 - ( KumaHeberu 9:27 ) Futhi njengalokhu kumiselwe abantu  ukuba bafe kanye, emva kwalokhu ukwahlulelwa .

- ( 2 Kor 5:10 ) Ngoba sonke kumelwe sibonakale  phambi kwesihlalo sokwahlulela  sikaKristu; ukuze yilowo nalowo amukele izinto ezenziwe ngomzimba wakhe,  ngokwalokho akwenzile, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi kuhle noma kubi .

IMIBONO YASEMPHAKAMENI NEYEBHAYIBHELI IFANA KANJANI? Kuyamangaza ukuthi kukhona futhi ukufana okuningi phakathi kwemibono yasempumalanga neyeBhayibheli, njengomqondo wokuzibophezela komuntu. Ngoba nakuba eNtshonalanga umqondo wokulahlwa ungase ugxekwe kaningi, umbono waseMpumalanga uqukethe umqondo ofanayo ncamashí nokuthi umuntu unecala ngezenzo zakhe. Iziveza, ngokwesibonelo, kumaphuzu alandelayo:

Ukuhlwanyela nokuvuna.  Uma siqala endleleni umthwalo wemfanelo ozibonakalisa ngayo ezinkolweni zaseMpumalanga, khona-ke ikakhulukazi imfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa kanye nomthetho we-karma okungowawo uqukethe umqondo walendaba nokuthi umuntu kufanele alungise izenzo zakhe ezingalungile futhi azikhokhele. Nakuba abanye abantu bevame ukuphika umqondo wokuthi sibhekene nokwahlulelwa nokulahlwa, imfundiso yokuqala yokuphindukuzalwa iqukethe umqondo ofanayo wokuthi kufanele sivune lokho esikutshalile, okungukuthi sikhokhele izenzo zethu ezingalungile.

    Umqondo wokuhlwanyela nokuvuna uvela encwadini eyaziwa kakhulu kaRauni-Leena Luukanen ethi "Kuolemaa ei ole" , engxenyeni yayo yokugcina, lapho okuthiwa "ugogo" womlobi edlulisela khona umlayezo ngaphesheya komngcele ngokubhala okuzenzakalelayo. Lesi sicaphuni (ikhasi 186) sibhekisa emcabangweni wokuthi sinomthwalo wemfanelo ngezenzo zethu futhi sizovuna esikutshalile:

Imfundiso ebalulekile yile: Umuntu uvuna akutshalile. Kukho konke, esikwenzile sinomthwalo wemfanelo. (…) Abantu abavamisile ukuqonda ukubaluleka komthetho we-karma.

Imfundiso yeTestamente Elisha iyafana impela: sizovuna esikutshalile. Lokhu kusho ukuthi ukwahlulela kwenzeka ngokwezenzo njengoba kuboniswe emavesini alandelayo:

- ( Gal 6:7 )  ... umuntu uyahlwanyela, lokho futhi uyokuvuna.

- ( Kol 3:25 ) Kepha owenza okubi uyakwamukeliswa okubi akwenzileyo, futhi akukho ukukhetha.

- ( IsAmbulo 20:12-15 ) Ngabona abafileyo, abancane nabakhulu, bemi phambi kukaNkulunkulu; izincwadi zavulwa, nenye incwadi yavulwa, eyincwadi yokuphila: abafileyo  bahlulelwa ngalokho okwakulotshwe ezincwadini,  ngokwemisebenzi yabo .

13 Ulwandle lwakhipha abafileyo ababekulo; nokufa nesihogo kwakhipha abafileyo ababekubo:  bahlulelwa yilowo nalowo ngokwemisebenzi yabo .

14 Ukufa nesihogo kwaphonswa echibini lomlilo. Lokhu kungukufa kwesibili.

15  Futhi noma ubani ongatholakalanga elotshiwe encwadini yokuphila waphonswa echibini lomlilo .

Umbono wokulahlwa. Umqondo womthwalo wethu wemfanelo kanye nokuthi umenzi wobubi kufanele akhokhe ngezenzo zakhe awukhawulelwe ekucaphuneni kwangaphambilini kanye nemfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa. Umbono ofanayo uvamile nasezinkolweni eziningana, lapho kunenkolelo evamile yesihogo nemiphumela emibi yezenzo ezingalungile. AmaSulumane nobuJuda ngokuvamile akholelwa esihogweni, kodwa ubuBuddha nabo banombono othile ngakho. Isicaphuni esilandelayo siphathelene nomqondo waseMpumalanga: 

Abafundi bami ngokuvamile banombono wokuthi abantu abalungile kuphela abangangena epharadesi futhi ababi kufanele baye esihogweni. UbuBuddha baseJapane bufundisa ngokuba khona kwazo zombili lezi “zindawo,” futhi abesabi nakancane ukusebenzisa igama elithi “isihogo” ngolimi lwenkolo lwendawo. Ngizama ukwenza izingane zibone ukuthi nazo zenze izinto ezimbi. (6)

Iphakade.  Uma kuziwa emthwalweni wethu wemfanelo kanye nobuphakade bokwahlulela, imfundiso yaseMpumalanga yokuphindukuzalwa, amalungu amaningi eNhlangano YeNkathi Entsha akholelwa kuyo futhi ayisekelayo, ingaholela emphumeleni ofanayo ncamashí nofanayo.

    Uma umenzi wobubi (isb. umuntu ofana noHitler) eqhubeka nokwenza okubi futhi engayilungisi indlela yokuphila kwakhe, naye kuyodingeka akukhokhele ezimpilweni zakhe ezilandelayo ngenxa yomthetho we-karma. Ukujeziswa komenzi wobubi ngomqondo othile kungunaphakade uma engayishintshi indlela yakhe yokuphila. Lokhu kungenzeka kakhulu uma kucatshangelwa imfundiso yokuphindukuzalwa. Ngokuyisisekelo, ngakho-ke ayihlukanga nganoma iyiphi indlela esijezisweni saphakade esishiwo eBhayibhelini.

    Umqondo wokuthi isahlulelo ingunaphakade uyavela nasenkolweni ethandwayo yaseShayina. Bakholelwa ukuthi isijeziso sabantu abathile, ikakhulukazi ababulali, singunaphakade. Abanalo ngisho nethuba lokuphindukuzalwa, njengoba isicaphuno esilandelayo sisitshela:

Inkolo ethandwayo yaseShayina ihlanganisa nombono wokuphindukuzalwa. (…) Umbulali ngeke azalwe kabusha Emhlabeni. Uyothwala isijeziso sakhe kuze kube phakade. Kunalokho, uma umuntu ebengumuntu olunge ngokwedlulele ekuphileni kwakhe kwangaphambili, uyokhululwa embuthanweni wokuphindukuzalwa futhi uyothuthela ezulwini elisentshonalanga lapho eyoba khona uBuddha. (7)

UKWAHLULELA KUSUSIWE! Nakuba imfundiso yebhayibheli yokuthi kuzoba nokwahlulelwa yavezwa phezulu, izindaba ezimnandi zithi wonke umuntu angakhululeka ngokuphelele ekwahlulelweni nasekulahlweni ngoJesu Kristu. Lokhu kunjalo ngoba uJesu Kristu akezanga emhlabeni ukuzokwahlulela abantu, kodwa ukubasindisa. Uzele ukuzosindisa abantu, ukuze wonke umuntu angene ekuhlanganyeleni noNkulunkulu nokuthi kwakungeke kudingeke aye esihogweni. Amavesi eBhayibheli alandelayo abhekisela kule ndaba ebalulekile:

- ( UJohane 3:17 )  Ngoba uNkulunkulu kayithumanga iNdodana yakhe emhlabeni ukuthi ilahle umhlaba; kodwa ukuze umhlaba usindiswe ngaye .

- ( Johane 12:47 ) Futhi uma noma ubani ezwa amazwi ami, futhi engawakholwa, angimahluleli:  ngoba angizanga ukuzokwahlulela izwe, kodwa ukuze ngisindise izwe .

 - ( Johane 5:24 ) Ngiqinisile, ngiqinisile ngithi kini, Ozwa izwi lami, akholwe ngongithumileyo,  unokuphila okuphakade, akayi ekwahlulelweni; kodwa wedlulile ekufeni wangena ekuphileni .

- ( Roma 8:1 ) Ngakho manje akukho ukulahlwa kwabakuKristu Jesu, abangahambi ngokwenyama, kodwa ngokukaMoya.

Ngakho into engcono kakhulu ongayenza manje iwukuphendukela kuJesu Kristu, okususwa nguye ukwahlulela. Kuye kuphela nangokuphendukela Kuye ungathola ukuphila okuphakade futhi ukhululwe ekulahlweni. Cabangela la mavesi afundisa ngale ndaba ebalulekile:

- ( Johane 5:40 )  Futhi aniyikuza kimi, ukuze nibe nokuphila .

 - ( Johane 6:35 ) UJesu wathi kubo: “  Mina ngiyisinkwa sokuphila  ; futhi okholwa kimi kasoze oma.

 - ( Math 11:28-30 )  Wozani kimi nina nonke enikhatheleyo nenisindwayo, mina ngizakuniphumuza .

29 Bekani ijoka lami phezu kwenu, nifunde kimi; ngokuba ngimnene, ngithobekile ngenhliziyo; niyakufumana ukuphumula emiphefumulweni yenu.

30 Ngokuba ijoka lami lihle, nomthwalo wami ulula.

- ( Johane 14:6 ) UJesu wathi kuye,  Mina ngiyindlela, neqiniso, nokuphila: akakho oza kuBaba ngaphandle kwami .

- ( Johane 6:68, 69 ) USimoni Petru wamphendula wathi: “  Nkosi, siyakuya kubani na? amazwi okuphila okuphakade nguwe .

69 Siyakholwa, siyazi ukuthi wena unguKristu, iNdodana kaNkulunkulu ophilayo.